Federal Court Declines to Suppress Statement Made by Habitual D.V. Defendant Represented by Tribal Lay Advocate

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials in United States v. Freemont (D. Neb.):

45 motion to suppress

46 response

58 magistrate report

59 objection

63 dct order

One thought on “Federal Court Declines to Suppress Statement Made by Habitual D.V. Defendant Represented by Tribal Lay Advocate”

  1. Joseph Flies-Away July 4, 2018 / 12:04 pm

    Tribal constitutional right to effective counsel and the 6th Amendment U.S. right, and a 5th Amendment U.S. right in regards to a state and or federal investigation/prosecution? Dokaho? (not sure of spelling)

Comments are closed.