How to Help

• Tribe: http://standwithstandingrock.net/donate/
• Camp: http://www.ocetisakowincamp.org/
• Water Protector Legal Collective: https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/11B5z8
• Medic Supplies: https://www.holisticlivingschool.org/standing-rock-medic-healer-council/

Posted docket entries and materials in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al (D.D.C. 16-cv-01534):

• 1- Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against United States Army Corps of Engineers filed by Standing Rock Sioux Tribe
  • 217- US Army Corps of Engineers’ Answer
• 5- Motion for Preliminary Injunction Request for Expedited Hearing
  • 5-1 Plaintiff’s Proposed Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Injunction
  • 5-2 Plaintiff’s Proposed Order Granting Motion for Expedited Hearing
• 7-1 Dakota Access, LLC’s Memorandum in Support of Unopposed Motion to Intervene in Support of Defendants
• 21- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
  • 24- Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
• 30- Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
  • 32- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Response to Plaintiffs’ and Intervenor-Plaintiff’s Motions for Temporary Restraining Order
    • 39- Memorandum Opinion, denying preliminary injunction
• 37- Intervenor-Plaintiff Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
• 65- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Notice Regarding Recently Issued Public Document
  • 65-1 Department of Army Memorandum Denying Easement
• 80- Cross-Claimant Dakota Access, LLC’s Motion Under the All Writs Act to Prevent Publication of Environmental-Impact-Statement Notice in Federal Register, and Emergency Motion for Interim Relief Through a Temporary Restraining Order
  • 80-1 Cross-Claimant Dakota Access, LLC’s Memorandum of Law Supporting Motion Under the All Writs Act to Prevent Publication of Environmental-Impact-Statement Notice in Federal Register, and Emergency Motion for Interim Relief Through a Temporary Restraining Order
    • MINUTE ORDER: As explained at today’s hearing, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs’ [30, 31] Motions for Temporary Restraining Order are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. As agreed by Defendants, the Court ORDERS that no construction activity on the DAPL may take place between Highway 1806 and 20 miles to the east of Lake Oahe. Construction activity to the west of Highway 1806 may proceed. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/6/2016. (lcjeb1) (Entered: 09/06/2016)
• 92- Dakota Access, LLC’S Motion for a Protective Order
  • 161- Dakota Access, LLC’s Reply in Support of Motion for a Protective Order
    • 205- Opinion re DAPL Mtn for Protective Order
      • 205- Order re DAPL Mtn for Protective Order
• 95- United States Army Corps of Enginees’ Notice Regarding Recently Issued Public Documents
  • 95-1 Notice to Congress
  • 95-2 Memorandum of Compliance with Presidential Memorandum
  • 95-3 Notice of Termination of EIS
• 98- Intervenor-Plaintiff Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
• 99- Intervenor-Plaintiff Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
• 117- Plaintiff Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
  • 159- Response of Dakota Access, LLC in Opposition to Plaintiff Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Summary Judgment
  • 172- US Army Corps of Engineers’ Opposition to Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
    • 195- Plaintiff Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Opposition to Corps and DAPL Motions for Partial Summary Judgment; Reply in Support of Tribe’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
    • 201- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Reply in Support of its Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe
    • 203- Reply of Dakota Access, LLC in Support of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
      • 238- Order on Summary Judgment Motions
        • 239- Memorandum Opinion on Cross Motions for Partial Summary Judgment
• 131- Intervenor-Plaintiff’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment
  • 131-1 Statement of Facts
  • 131-2 Exhibit
  • 131-3 Exhibit
  • 131-4 Exhibit
  • 131-5 Exhibit
  • 131-6 Text of Proposed Order
    • 183- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Opposition to Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
      • 184- Joinder of Dakota Access, LLC in United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
        • 185- Dakota Access, LLC’s Consolidated (1) Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Summary Judgment and (2) Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
          • 207- Plaintiff-Intervenor Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to United States Army Corps of Engineers and Dakota Access’ Cross Motions for Summary Judgment
            • 213- Dakota Access, LLC’s Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
            • 214- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Reply in Support of its Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
• 133- Intervenor-Plaintiff Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Unopposed Motion for Expedited Briefing Schedule on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
  • 133-1 Text of Proposed Order
• 145- Motion of Proposed Intervenors
  • 145-1- Complaint of Proposed Intervenors
    • 189- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Opposition to Sara Jumping Eagle et al.’s Motion to Intervene and Response to Statement of Proposed Intervenors as to Adequacy of Representation by the Tribes
    • 192- Response of Dakota Access, LLC in Opposition to Sara Jumping Eagle et al.’s Motion to Intervene
• 153- Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time
  • 154- Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time
• 155- Intervenor Steve Vance’s Reply to Dakota Access’ and the Army Corps of Engineers Oppositions to Motion to Intervene
• 156- Status Report of Dakota Access, LLC
• 157- Order Denying Plaintiff Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
  • 158- Memorandum Order
• 160- Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
  • 160-1 Proposed Order
• 162- Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Declaration
  • 162-1 Declaration of William R. Perry
    • 163- Response of Dakota Access, LLC to Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Leave to File a Declaration
• 164- Intervenor-Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal
• 165- Intervenor-Plaintiff’s Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal Under FRCP 62(c)
  • 165-1 Proposed Order Granting Intervenor-Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
    • 168- Response of Dakota Access, LLC to Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal Under FRCP 62(c)
    • 170- US Army Corps of Engineers’ Opposition to Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
      • 171- Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion
• 166- Declaration of William R. Perry
• 167- Order and Memorandum Opinion, denying preliminary injunction
• 169- Status Report of Dakota Access, LLC
• 174- US Army Corps of Engineers’ Unopposed Motion to Consolidate
  • 174-1 Proposed Order
• 175- Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time
  • 176- Response of Dakota Access, LLC to Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Motion for Extension of Time for Response/Reply Brief
• 177- Plaintiff-Intervenor Steve Vanve’s Response to the Court’s March 13, 2017 Minute Order
  • 190- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Reply to Steve Vance’s Response to the Court’s March 13, 2017 Order
  • 194- Reply of Dakota Access, LLC to Steve Vance’s Response to the Court’s March 13, 2017 Minute Order
• 179- Status Report of Dakota Access, LLC
• 180- Statement of Proposed Intervenors as to Adequacy of Representation by the Tribes
• 181- Notice of Lodging Administrative Record
• 188- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Response to Standing Rock Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribes’ Motions for Leave to Amend Their Complaints Amicus Curiae
  • 193- Opposition of Dakota Access, LLC to Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Motions to Amend Complaints
  • 198- Intervenor-Plaintiff’s Consolidated Reply in Support of Motion to Amend Complaint
  • 200 SRST Reply to Motion to Amend Complaint
• 191- Status Report of Dakota Access, LLC
• 198- CRST Motion to Extend Time
• 209- Joint Appendix of Administrative Record Citations
  • 212- Errata to Joint Appendix of Administrative Record Citations
• 216- Motion to Compel Prompt Completion of Administrative Record
  • 219- Plaintiff Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Response to Motion to Compel Completion of Administrative Record
  • 222- Response of Plaintiff Oglala Sioux Tribe in Opposition to Motion of Defendant-Intervenor Dakota Access, LLC, to Compel Prompt Completion of the Administrative Record
  • 223- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Opposition to Dakota Access’s Motion to Compel Completion of Administrative Record
  • 225- Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Completion of Administrative Record
    • 225-1 – Declaration of David Debold in Support of Dakota Access, LLC’s Reply on its Motion to Compel Completion of Administrative Record
• 218- Joint Appendix of Administrative Record Citations in Summary Judgment Briefs
• 220- Intervenor-Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record and Alternative Motion to Consider Documents Outside the Administrative Record
• 221- Notice of Adding Documents to the November 10, 2016 and March 21, 2017 Administrative Records
• 224- Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe’s Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record and Consider Documents Outside the Administrative Record
• 226- Dakota Access, LLC’s Unopposed Motion to Intervene in Support of Defendant
  • 226-1 – Proposed Responsive Pleading
  • 226-2 – Answer
• 258- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Brief Regarding Remedy
• 259- Motion of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Petroleum Institute, the Association of Oil Pipe Lines, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the National Association of Manufacturers for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Dakota Access, LLC’s Brief on Vacatur
  • 259-1 – Exhibit A: Amici Curiae Brief
  • 259-2 – Declaration of David Murk in Support of Amici Curiae Brief
  • 259-3 – Proposed Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief
• 283 – Order
  • 284 – Memorandum Opinion
• Doc. 293 Reply in Support of Imposition of Remand Conditions
  • Doc. 293-1 Proposed Order
    • Doc. 304 – Memorandum Opinion
• Amicus Curiae
  • National Indigenous Women’s Resource Center
  • Oglala Sioux Tribe
  • Association on American Indian Affairs, Pueblo of Pojoaque, and University of New Mexico School of Law Natural Resources and Environmental Law Clinic
  • National Congress of American Indians, Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, Alaska Intertribal Council, Great Plains Tribal Chairman’s Association, Intertribal Association of Arizona, National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, National Indian Education Association, National Indian Gaming Association, United South and Eastern Tribes Sovereignty Protection Fund, Inc., American Civil Liberties Union, Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, and 34 Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
  • Great Plains Tribal Chairmans’ Association

Associated cases:

Yankton Sioux Tribe et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al (D.D.C. 16-cv-01796)

• 1- Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Oglala Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C. 17-cv-00267)

• 1- Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al (USCA 16-cv-05259)

• Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
  • Federal Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff-Appellant’s Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
  • Intervenor-Defendant’s Opposition to Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
• 10/05/2016 Oral arguments
• Amended Order, administrative injunction (9/16/2016)
• Order, dissolving administrative injunction (10/9/2016)

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al (USCA 17-cv-05043)

• CRST’s Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
  • Federal Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff-Appellant’s Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
    • CRST’s Reply in Support of Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
  • Response of Dakota Access, LLC to Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
    • Exhibits to Response of Dakota Access, LLC to Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
• Order, denied