Wisconsin Federal Court Signals Ho-Chunk Should Prevail over Kalshi & Robinhood but Declines to Grant Injunction

Here are the materials in Ho-Chunk Nation v. Kalshi Inc. (W.D. Wis.):

Mescalero, Isleta, Pojoaque, and Sandia Sue Kalshi for Illegal Gaming

Here is the complaint in Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi Inc. (D.N.M.):

Muscogee (Creek) Nation SCT Denies Enforcement and Contempt Motions Citing Separation of Powers and Closes Freedmen Citizenship Case

Here is the order in Citizenship Board of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Grayson and Kennedy:

Prior post here.

Tenth Circuit Briefs in Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Kunzweiler

Here:

Other briefs TK.

Lower court materials here and here.

California Federal Court Finds Pechanga Likely to Win Dispute with IHS over Denial of Opioid Treatment Facility Contract but Did Not Find Irreparable Harm

Here are materials in Pechanga Band of Indians v. Kennedy (C.D. Cal.):

Prior post here.

Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment in Maine Internet Gaming Case

Here are the new materials in Oxford Casino Hotel v. Champion (D. Me.):

Prior post here and here.

Alex Zhang on Taxation of Indian, Indian Tribes, and the Territories

Alex Zhang has published “The Other Taxation: Tribes, Territories, and Fiscal Autonomy” in the Columbia Law Review.

Here is the abstract:

Native Americans pay taxes. Territories, by contrast, tax in place of the federal government. Both live with the legacy of American imperialism. Both seek the elusive fiscal self-governance and autonomy promised by Congress. The Supreme Court—through preemption, the plenary power doctrine, and interpretive principles—has hollowed out the Native tax base, forcing tribes to compete fiercely with Congress, states, and localities for revenue. By contrast, territorial residents pay no federal or state taxes on territorially sourced income by edicts of Congress and geography. But such tax exemption enabled the creation of incentive regimes that have only invited more criticism as entrenching subordination. This Article argues that the conceptual underpinnings of the divergent tax treatment of tribes and territories are unsound. Under a more robust vision of fiscal autonomy, judicial limits on Native tax sovereignty are misguided. The territories’ wide latitude in designing revenue streams merits increased scrutiny. While imperfect, a uniform, nonrefundable federal income-tax credit for tribal and territorial taxes paid is a promising path forward. This Article thus provides the first systematic study of subfederal taxation beyond states and localities—the “other” American taxation often overlooked in scholarship.

Tenth Circuit to Review Indian Status Cases En Banc

Here are the materials in United States v. Ruiz:

Ruiz panel materials here.

And here are the materials in United States v. Hebert:

Hebert panel materials here.

Here is the order granting the en banc petition in both cases:

Ninth Circuit Affirms George v. Colville

Here is the unpublished opinion in George v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.

Lower court materials here. Unable to access briefs.