In Victory for Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. The Army, the 4th Circuit Confirms NAGPRA Applies to Carlisle

Here is the Fourth Circuit’s decision vacating the lower court’s dismissal and holding that the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) applies in Winnebago v. Department of the Army.

The ruling allows the Tribe to proceed with its lawsuit against the U.S. Army seeking repatriation of the remains of Samuel Gilbert and Edward Hensley, two Winnebago boys who died at the Carlisle Indian Industrial School more than 125 years ago.

The Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska’s Chairman, Chairman Brown stated, “The Fourth Circuit’s ruling brings joy to the Tribe. As the Court recognized, it would be a disservice to find NAGPRA does not protect the Winnebago’s right to bring home Samuel Gilbert and Edward Hensley for proper burials, according to our traditional practices. NAGPRA is an important statute our relatives fought for and is meant to “address the desires of Indians to bury their dead,” a right “for too long ignored.” 

NARF Senior Staff Attorney Beth Margaret Wright explains, “Winnebago’s lawsuit demonstrates its commitment to honor its ancestors and its children; Winnebago continues to advocate for its rights under NAGPRA to bring Samuel and Edward home and provide them with the Tribal burials they were denied over 125 years ago. The Fourth Circuit recognized that Congress enacted NAGPRA as a remedy for this ‘shameful injustice.’”

“This is an extraordinarily important decision not only for the Winnebago Tribe, but for Tribal Nations across the country seeking to ensure that federal agencies finally comply with the laws enacted to help address the profound and multigenerational trauma inflicted by the federal Indian boarding school system,” said Greg Werkheiser of Cultural Heritage Partners, co-counsel for the Tribe.

More here. Previous post here.

Yurok Tribe and Allies Prevail over EPA on decaBDE Regulation

Here is the opinion in Yurok Tribe v. EPA.

Ball-and-stick model of the decabromodiphenyl ether molecule

An excerpt:

The panel granted a petition for review of a 2024 Rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) concerning regulation of Decabromodiphenyl Ether (“decaBDE”), an additive flame retardant used in numerous products, and remanded without vacatur of the 2024 Rule to the EPA for renewed rulemaking and any other proceedings.

Hopson Brief in Opposition

Here:

Cert petition here.

Wisconsin Federal Court Signals Ho-Chunk Should Prevail over Kalshi & Robinhood but Declines to Grant Injunction

Here are the materials in Ho-Chunk Nation v. Kalshi Inc. (W.D. Wis.):

Mescalero, Isleta, Pojoaque, and Sandia Sue Kalshi for Illegal Gaming

Here is the complaint in Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi Inc. (D.N.M.):

Muscogee (Creek) Nation SCT Denies Enforcement and Contempt Motions Citing Separation of Powers and Closes Freedmen Citizenship Case

Here is the order in Citizenship Board of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Grayson and Kennedy:

Prior post here.

Tenth Circuit Briefs in Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Kunzweiler

Here:

Other briefs TK.

Lower court materials here and here.

California Federal Court Finds Pechanga Likely to Win Dispute with IHS over Denial of Opioid Treatment Facility Contract but Did Not Find Irreparable Harm

Here are materials in Pechanga Band of Indians v. Kennedy (C.D. Cal.):

Prior post here.

Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment in Maine Internet Gaming Case

Here are the new materials in Oxford Casino Hotel v. Champion (D. Me.):

Prior post here and here.