Fond du Lac Ojibwe Sues EPA over Mine, “Existential Threat” to Tribe

Here is the complaint in Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. Stepp (D. Minn.):

1-complaint-3.pdf

“Waters of the United States” Comments by Michigan Tribal Interests

CORA, GTB, and Bay Mills comments on EPA’s proposal to change the definition of “Waters of the United States.”

Bay Mills-WOTUS Comments Regarding EPA-HQ-OW-2018-0149

CORA Comments WOTUS 2019

GTB 4-12-19 letter +map

EPA Issues Water Quality Regulation to Protect the Penobscot River

Link: Bangor Daily News article by Judy Harrison,

Download: Promulgation of Certain Federal Water Quality Standards Applicable to Maine (Final Rule)Fact Sheet: Final Rule on Certain Federal Water Quality Standards Applicable to MaineResponse to Public Comments

EPA Issues Water Quality Regulation to Protect the Penobscot River

On Thursday, the EPA issued water quality standards governing the Penobscot River to protect the sustenance fishing rights of the Penobscot Nation.  Penobscot Chief, Kirk Francis, praised EPA.  “This is great news for the Penobscot River, the Penobscot People, and the State of Maine,” said Francis.  “This brings us one step closer to restoring the fish habitat of the Penobscot River for the betterment of all who use this extraordinary River.”

The Penobscot River, the aboriginal homeland of the Penobscot Indian Nation, historically supported the largest habitat for sea run salmon in the North Atlantic.  The Penobscot River has also supported robust populations of shad, eel, alewives, blueback herring and multiple other species that the Penobscots have relied upon for food.

The Atlantic salmon is an anadromous fish, which typically spends 2-3 years in freshwater before migrating to the ocean, where it also spends 2-3 years before returning to its natal river to spawn.  Although the Atlantic salmon has been listed on the endangered species list since 2009, the State of Maine, a number of US agencies, NGOs, and the Penobscot Nation are working together in an internationally-recognized river restoration project to improve fish habitats in the Penobscot River through dam removals and other efforts.

“The federal and private investment of millions of dollars to restore the Penobscot River’s migratory fisheries is now resulting in rebounding runs of herring, shad, sturgeon, and over time we expect, Atlantic salmon.” said Andrew Goode, Vice President of the Atlantic Salmon Federation.  “The EPA’s water quality standards are an important contribution to the restoration of these fisheries for the benefit of the Penobscot Indian Nation and the people of Maine.”

A year ago, the EPA disapproved human health criteria that Maine used in its water quality standards because they exposed Penobscot tribal members and other Maine Indians to cancer risks, given tribal fish consumption rates.  Maine used a fish consumption rate of 32.4 grams per day for Native populations.  The EPA found that rate erroneous and adopted water quality standards to protect the health of tribal members at a consumption rate of 286 grams per day.

Historically, Penobscot tribal members have consumed fish and other food sources from the Penobscot River at much higher rates.  In the 1980s and early 1990s, for example, Penobscots relied upon the River for food sources at the rates averaging up to 750 grams per day. But those consumption rates went down in the face of dioxin and other pollutant contamination in the River.

“We still have a ways to go to restore the health of the River,” said Chief Francis, “but EPA’s water quality standards are a huge step forward to ensure that Penobscot people can safely eat from the River as we have done for centuries.”

In 1980, upon settling land claims of the Penobscot Nation and other tribes, the US Congress confirmed that the tribes would have a right to take fish within their reservations for sustenance.  Last year, the EPA, backed by the US Department of the Interior, told Maine that the law required the existence of fish of a quality to eat at meaningful levels of consumption.  Maine officials have, in the past, taken the position that the Tribes’ sustenance fishing rights do not guarantee a fish habitat.

Public support for EPA’s water quality standards is overwhelming:  of the 107 comments provided to the Agency, 101 were in favor of the standards and only 6 voiced concerns. EPA’s standards protect the fishing rights of all Maine tribes.

“As indigenous people, we have long known that water is life,” said Chief Francis.  “EPA’s water quality standards protect life; it’s as simple as that.”

Colorado gold mine is one of the EPA’s new Superfund pollution sites

A Colorado gold mine that spilled more than 3 million gallons of wastewater into western rivers was among nearly a dozen sites added Wednesday to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund National Priorities List.

HERE.

Prior posts on the Gold King Mine HERE.

 

Maine’s Second Amended Complaint in State v. McCarthy

Doc. 30- Second Amended Complaint

Previous Turtle Talk coverage here.

Maine is suing the EPA over agency action concerning the State’s surface water quality standards.

President’s Memo Outlines New Environmental Policy

Link to Memorandum here.

The Obama Administration advised the Departments of the Interior, Agriculture, Defense, EPA, and NOAA to avoid harming the environment by ensuring, at minimum, a “no net loss goal” for natural resources deemed important, scarce, or sensitive.  The Departments will forgo development of resources deemed “irreplaceable.”

The new policy requires federal regulators to evaluate every proposed natural resource project from a large-scale context, including water-shed and landscape impacts.  Going forward, the government’s policy will be to protect the environment by foreseeing and mitigating any damage ahead of time.  The Departments have been given a time table for finalizing mitigation mechanisms and guidance.

This is the latest episode in a controversy over energy developments in Indian Country.  Republicans in Congress are attempting to enact a law that would speed up energy development on Tribal lands after a GAO report criticized the 2005 federal process for transferring management of energy development to Tribes that has not resulted in any agreements (TERAs).