Here is the opinion in Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. State of Washington.
Available briefs:
Lower court materials here.
Ninth Circuit Partially Restores Sauk-Suiattle U&A Petition [subproceeding 24-01]
Ninth Circuit
Ninth Circuit Rules in Favor of State/Tribal Regulation of Prediction Markets
Ninth Circuit Vacates Alaska Tribal Fee-to-Trust Decision
Here is the unpublished opinion in State of Alaska v. Newland:
Available briefs:
Lower court materials here.
Teck Metals v. Colville Cert Petition
Here:
Question presented:
The question presented is whether CERCLA authorizes damages for the felt loss of a cultural connection to natural resources.
Lower court materials here.
United States v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Cert Petition
Here:
Lower court materials here.
Related: J.R. Simplot Co. LLC v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes petition:
Alaska Federal Court Denies Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, Orders Trial, in Metlakatla Fishing Rights Matter
Here are the new materials in Metlakatla Indian Community v. Dunleavy (D. Alaska):
Prior posts here.
Ninth Circuit Materials in Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi
Wilton Rancheria Files Cert Petition in Labor Dispute
Here is the petition in Wilton Rancheria v. UNITE HERE:
Question presented:
Notwithstanding the deference afforded to arbitration awards, arbitrators lack the power to facially invalidate federal and state statutes. Similarly, courts defer to Tribal interpretation of Tribal law, as a critical element of longstanding policies upholding and safeguarding Tribal sovereignty. Does an arbitrator exceed his authority when he facially invalidates a duly-enacted Tribal law, especially when a court would not do so and when he would not be permitted to invalidate a duly-enacted federal or state statute?
Lower court materials here. Ninth Circuit unpublished opinion here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.