Here is the opinion in State of Texas v. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo.
Briefs:
Indian gaming
Federal Court Holds Interior May Not Take Land into Trust for Gaming Purposes for Keetoowah
Here is the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. Bernhardt (N.D. Okla.):
Prior post here.
Cayuga Nation Prevails over Village in Gaming Case
Casino Development Firm Sues Sault Tribe over Lansing and Wayne County Gaming Proposals
Here is the complaint in JLLJ Development LLC v. Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority (W.D. Mich.):
NPR: “Tribes in Michigan struggle with decision to shut down casinos for coronavirus”
Here.
Oklahoma AG Opinion on Indian Gaming Revenues
Fourth Case (at least?) Filed Involving Human Remains at Jamul
Here is the complaint in Rosales v. United States (E.D. Cal.):
Update in Cayuga Nation Gaming Dispute with Village of Union Springs
Here are updated pleadings in Cayuga Nation v. Tanner (N.D. N.Y.):
124-1-cayuga-motion-for-summary-j.pdf
Prior posts here.
Sault Tribe Prevails over Interior over Interpretation of Mandatory Trust Land Acquisition Statute
Here is the opinion in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
Case tag here.
South Dakota Cert Petition in IGRA Preemption Case
Here is the petition in Noem v. Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe:
noem-v-flandreau-cert-petition.pdf
Question presented:
Does the Bracker test currently serve as a consistent and predictable rule of law in light of the exponential expansion of Indian gaming since 1988 and the fiscal demands the industry now places on state budgets?
Lower court materials here.
