Here are the new materials in Guidiville Rancheria of California v. Bluerock Real Estate Holdings LLC (N.D. Cal.):
Prior post here.

Here are the new materials in Guidiville Rancheria of California v. Bluerock Real Estate Holdings LLC (N.D. Cal.):
Prior post here.

Here is the petition in Wilton Rancheria v. UNITE HERE:
Question presented:
Notwithstanding the deference afforded to arbitration awards, arbitrators lack the power to facially invalidate federal and state statutes. Similarly, courts defer to Tribal interpretation of Tribal law, as a critical element of longstanding policies upholding and safeguarding Tribal sovereignty. Does an arbitrator exceed his authority when he facially invalidates a duly-enacted Tribal law, especially when a court would not do so and when he would not be permitted to invalidate a duly-enacted federal or state statute?
Lower court materials here. Ninth Circuit unpublished opinion here.

Here are the materials in Guidiville Rancheria of California v. Ginsburg (N.D. Cal.):

Here is the complaint in Guidiville Rancheria of California v. Bluerock Real Estate Holdings LLC (N.D. Cal.):

Here are the materials in UNITE HERE v. Wilton Rancheria (E.D. Cal.):

Here is the complaint in Navajo Transitional Energy Co. v. Criticalpoint Partners LLC (E.D. Pa.):

Here is the opinion in Caremark LLC v. Choctaw Nation.
Briefs:

Here is the complaint in Chickasaw Nation v. Caremark CVS (E.D. Okla.):
Most of the other pleadings are sealed.
Here are the materials in Caremark LLC v. Chickasaw Nation (D. Ariz.):
1 Petition to Compel Arbitration
13 Motion to Compel Arbitration
And here are the briefs so far in Caremark LLC v. Chickasaw Nation (9th Cir.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.