Here are the materials in Hogshooter v. Cherokee Nation (E.D. Okla.):
Eastern District of Oklahoma
Elected Officials at Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town Move to Dismiss Faction Effort to Assume Control over Tribal Funds
Here are the new materials in Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. First National Bank and Trust (E.D. Okla.):
Prior post here.
Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town Sues Bank over Disputed Funds in Leadership Dispute
Here is the amended complaint in Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. First National Band and Trust Company of Okmulgee (E.D. Okla.):
Ninth Circuit Orders Chickasaw Nation to Arbitration with Pharmacy Benefits Manager
Choctaw Citizens Sue for Tax Relief under McGirt
Here is the complaint in Meashintubby v. Paulk (E.D. Okla.):
Materials in Chickasaw Nation Dispute with CVS
Here is the complaint in Chickasaw Nation v. Caremark CVS (E.D. Okla.):
Most of the other pleadings are sealed.
Here are the materials in Caremark LLC v. Chickasaw Nation (D. Ariz.):
1 Petition to Compel Arbitration
13 Motion to Compel Arbitration
And here are the briefs so far in Caremark LLC v. Chickasaw Nation (9th Cir.):
Federal Court Declines to Dismiss Federal Indictment of Patrick Dwayne Murphy
Here are relevant materials in United States v. Murphy (E.D. Okla.):
68 Motion to Dismiss — Statute of Limitations
Oklahoma Death Row Prisoner Granted Leave to File Habeas Petition Based on McGirt [Choctaw Reservation]
Here are the materials so far in Ryder v. Sharp (E.D. Okla.):
Federal Court Dismisses Habeas Petition Based on Murphy v. Royal as Time-Barred
Here are the materials in Barbre v. Whitten (E.D. Okla.):
E.D. Okla. Rules in Favor of Cherokee Nation and Remands UKB Trust Application
Download the documents and materials in the matter of The Cherokee Nation v. Jewell et al, 14-cv-00428 (E.D. Okla. May 31, 2017):
- Doc. 67 – Plaintiff’s Merits Brief
- Doc. 77 – Intervenor-Defendants’ Response Merits Brief
- Doc. 78 – Cherokee Nation Reply Brief
- Doc. 79-1 – Federal Defendants’ Response Merits Brief
- Doc. 80 – Order
The Court ruled a 2011 BIA decision approving an amended land into trust application of the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee was arbitrary and capricious. On remand, the BIA must obtain Cherokee Nation’s consent to the application per its treaty rights over former reservation land, give full consideration to the jurisdictional conflicts between Cherokee Nation and UKB, the resulting administrative burdens on the BIA, and the effects of Carcieri.
Link: Previous posts
You must be logged in to post a comment.