Otoe-Missouria Tribe – Page 2 – Turtle Talk

Oklahoma SCT Holds Gov. Stitt Did Not Possess Authority to Enter into Gaming Compacts with Comanche Nation & Ote-Missouri Tribe

July 22, 2020July 22, 2020Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the opinion in Treat v. Stitt:

Third Circuit Rejects Tribal Sovereign Lending Arbitration Demand

July 15, 2020Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials in Williams v. Medley Opportunity Fund II:

red-stone-appellant-brief.pdf

nafoa-amicus-brief.pdf

appellee-brief-1.pdf

american-assn-of-justice-amicus-brief.pdf

red-stone-reply.pdf

Oklahoma AG Opinion on Legality of Recent Gaming Compacts [updated]

May 5, 2020May 15, 2020Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

AG Opinion 2020-8 (W-7)

Update:

05 13 response memo to ag hunter

United States Files Cert Opposition in Great Plains Lending v. CFPB

November 10, 2017November 10, 2017Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

US Cert Opp Brief

Cert petition here.

Tenth Circuit Remands Great Plains Lending Dispute for Jurisdictional Discovery on Immunity Defense

June 1, 2017Matthew L.M. Fletcher1 Comment

Here is the unpublished opinion in Finn v. Great Plains Lending LLC.

Briefs and other materials here.

Tenth Circuit Materials in Finn v. Great Plains Lending LLC

March 6, 2017March 22, 2017Matthew L.M. Fletcher1 Comment

Here:

Great Plains Lending Brief

Lower court materials here.

Florida Court Affirms Immunity of Tribally-Owned LLC

October 6, 2016Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the opinion in Monahan v. Great Plains Lending, LLC (Fla. Cir. Ct.):

ca15-0449_order_granting_defendant_great_plains_lending_

Oral Argument Video in CFPB v. Great Plains Lending

June 7, 2016Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here. Audio here.

Briefs here.

Lower court materials here.

Briefs in Great Plains Lending LLC v. State of Connecticut Dept. of Banking

September 10, 2015November 24, 2015Matthew L.M. Fletcher1 Comment

Here:

Great Plains Brief

Dept of Banking Brief

Otoe-Missouria Tribal Chairman Brings Civil Rights Action against Connecticut Dept. of Banking

March 10, 2015Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the complaint in Shotton v. Pitkin (W.D. Okla.):

An excerpt:

Plaintiff brings this action as a result of unlawful enforcement actions taken by Defendants against Plaintiff and Defendants’ entry of a state administrative order imposing a civil penalty of $700,000 against Plaintiff in his individual capacity and unlawfully restraining his conduct without due process of law and in violation of his individual right to immunity as a tribal official.

Our post on a related suit in Connecticut Superior Court action is here.