Here.
While judges are legally required to play the role of the rights-protector, in practice, they are sent a different message. They are encouraged to collaborate with child welfare agencies, even while litigation is pending before them involving that same agency. They are implicitly – or explicitly – told not to make negative findings against the agency for fear that such a finding could jeopardize the agency’s funding. In fact, judges are invited to participate in inter-agency task forces on how to make “better” findings to appease federal auditors. And they celebrate when their state agency secures federal funding based on the drafting of their orders.
The link doesn’t work and I can’t find the blog post by googling it. Help?
Link works fine for us . . . here is the whole thing:
https://www.naccchildlawblog.org/juvenile-justice/is-our-juvenile-court-system-schizophrenic/