The lower court opinion in Ho-Chunk Nation v. Wisc. Dept. of Revenue is here. Oral argument was last month.
Here are the questions presented:
Is the petitioner entitled to a refund of cigarette tax revenue for the sale of cigarettes on DeJope property pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 139.31 and 139.323 (3)?
What is the reasonable interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 139.323 (3)’s “designated . . .trust land” within the context of the sale of cigarettes on the DeJope property?
Turtle Talk 