Here is the opinion in B. O. v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs. (Tex. App.):
B.O. v. Texas Dept. of Family & Prot. Services
An excerpt:
In her second issue, Grandmother contends that the trial court erroneously excluded evidence of the children’s Native American heritage. Grandmother argues that because the trial court sustained an objection lodged when counsel for Father stated during opening argument that the evidence would show that Father was of Native American ancestry, there was a “chilling effect” on the presentation of evidence regarding the children’s heritage and therefore the jury was deprived of information about the children’s Native American background. We are unable to consider this argument, however, because neither Father nor Grandmother preserved it for appellate review.
Turtle Talk 