Here is the opinion in Jensen v. EXC Inc.
Briefs and lower court materials here.
District of Arizona
Gila River Indian Community and San Carlos Apache Tribe Win Water Rights Dispute
Here are the materials in Gila River Indian Community v. Schoebroek (D. Ariz.):
87 Schoebroek MSJ Claim Preclusion
89 Schoebroek MSJ on Jurisdiction
101 Gila River Opposition to 87
103 Gila River Opposition to 89
111 Schoebroek MTD San Carlos Complaint
112 San Carlos Apache Complaint in Intervention
116 Tribes Motion for Sanctions
Prior post here.
Arizona Federal Court Dismisses Suit against Salt River’s Great Wolf Lodge Brought by Anti-Masking Assholes
Here are (many of the) materials in Preciado v. Great Wolf Lodge (D. Ariz.):
23 Motion to Dismiss Tribe Defendants
24 Motion to Dismiss GWL Defendants
Arizona Federal Court Holds Business 51% Owned by Navajo Company Not Immune from Title VII Suit
Here are the materials in Tsosie v. NTUA Wireless LLC (D. Ariz.):
Ninth Circuit En Banc Oral Argument in Apache Stronghold v. United States
Amicus Briefs in the Ninth Circuit En Banc Stage of Apache Stronghold v. United States
Here is the fantastic amicus brief on behalf of tribes and tribal orgs written by April Youpee-Roll at Munger and Jason Searle and Beth Wright at NARF:
Here are the other briefs:
Protect the First Amicus Brief
Religious Liberty Scholars Amicus Briefs
Prior post here.
Arizona Federal Court Allows Navajo Suit against Interior over Hopi Trust Land Acquisition
Here are the materials in Navajo Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Ariz.):
This case is on remand after the parties agreed to the vacature of the district court’s dismissal of the suit.
Ninth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of San Carlos Apache Health Care Contract Support Costs Suit
Here is the opinion in San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Beccera.
An excerpt:
A simplified example clarifies this scheme. Assume that a tribe administers a $3 million healthcare program for its members. It costs the tribe $500,000 in administrative costs to do so. IHS therefore will pay the tribe $3.5 million. Additionally, the tribe recovers $1 million for those procedures from outside insurers. It is statutorily required to spend that $1 million on health care as well.
But there is a hole in this statutory scheme. Who pays the CSC for that additional $1 million in health care that the tribe must provide with its third-party revenue? At the heart of this lawsuit is Plaintiff-Appellant San Carlos Apache Tribe’s (“the Tribe”) contention that IHS must cover those additional CSC.
Briefs here.
Arizona Federal Court Dismisses Navajo Suit Challenging Implementation of Navajo-Hopi Settlement Act of 1974 [updated]
Here are the materials in Navajo Nation v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (D. Ariz.):
Updated materials:
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.