Here are the unpublished opinions in In re D.S. (here and here). Here is a description of these cases from a dedicated reader:
This decision deals with whether Expert Witness Testimony needs to “support” the overall decision of the Trial Court’s decision to terminate parental rights. In the first decision, the Court of Appeals misunderstood the parents’ arguments on the expert witness testimony issue. The Court thought they were claiming that no QEW testimony was provided. On the contrary, the parents felt that there was QEW and that QEW testimony needed to support the Trial Court’s decision. The parents stated the QEW testimony did not support the Trial Court’s decision, and thus asked for the Court of Appeals to reconsider its decision. The second decision essentially states that there is a split on whether QEW testimony just needs to be provided or if the QEW testimony actually needs to support the Trial Court’s decision. This appellate panel decided that QEW testimony does not need to support the overall decision.
An excerpt from the first:
Turtle Talk 