Nebraska Supreme Court Modifies Storevisions Opinion…

…but still holds that a signed tribal waiver can be authorized by the presence of 5 of 7 tribal council members (instead of an affirmative vote in a regular meeting required by the tribal constitution).

Here is the order:

Storevisions Modified Opinion.

Here are the materials:

Briefing in StoreVisions v. Omaha Tribe — Petition for Rehearing Pending in Nebraska Supreme Court — UPDATED

Here is the Nebraska Supreme Court’s opinion.

And the materials we have so far:

Omaha Tribe Appellant Brief

Storevisions Appellee Brief

Omaha Tribe Reply Brief

2011-04-04 Omaha Tribe Motion for Rehearing

Storevisions Response to Motion for Rehearing.

2011-04-25 Amici Curiae Brief inSupport of Def-appellant Omaha

Nebraska SCT Holds Tribal Officials with “Apparent Authority” (Not Actual Authority) May Waive Tribal Immunity

Here is today’s opinion in StoreVisions v. Omaha Tribe (as first reported in Indianz).

An excerpt:

As noted, this separate waiver was signed in the presence offive of the seven members of the tribal council and lends even more weight to an appearance that the signatories to the document—the chairman and vice chairman—were vested with theauthority to waive the tribe’s sovereign immunity.

The court refused to take judicial notice of tribal laws for some reason, and gave great weight to the mere presence of tribal council members in finding a waiver. Fairly remarkable decision.