The two cases are United States v. Navajo Nation (No. 07-1410) and Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs (No. 07-1372). The good news is that the Court declined to grant cert in Kemp v. Osage (No. 07-1484).
From SCOTUSblog:
Docket: 07-1372
Title: Hawaii, et al. v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, et al.
Issue: Whether a 1993 congressional resolution requires Hawaii to reach a political settlement with native Hawaiians before transferring some 1.2 million acres of state land.
- Opinion below (Supreme Court of Hawaii)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition
- Petitioner’s reply
- Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation (in support of petitioner)
- Brief amicus curiae of Commissioner of Public Lands for the State of New Mexico (in support of petitioner)
- Brief amici curiae of Washington, et al. (in support of petitioner)
______________
Docket: 07-1410
Title: United States v. Navajo Nation
Issue: Whether the Court’s prior decision in United States v. Navajo Nation (2003) foreclosed a finding that the government breached fiduciary duties in connection with Indian coal lease amendments.
- Opinion below (Federal Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition
- Petitioner’s reply
Turtle Talk 
Matthews’ long post of September 2nd on who would make the cert cut was correct. Let’s see if he can call who wins and loses in the final decision.