Here is the opinion in Felter v. Salazar (D. D.C.) — Dismissal Memo 1.15.10.
An excerpt:
Although P.L. 108-108 did revive at the time of its enactment time-barred claims then pending in litigation, it did not waive the preclusive effects of prior judgments, and the plaintiffs are collaterally estopped from arguing that the defendants had an obligation to supervise in trust the plaintiffs’ share of the ICC judgment. The plaintiffs therefore cannot demonstrate that they are entitled to an accounting, and the defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted.
Turtle Talk 