Here is the opinion in U.S. v. Morsette.
An excerpt:
A jury convicted Defendant Richard Charles Morsette ofassault for attacking two people in his home, which is locatedon Rocky Boy’s Indian Reservation in Montana. At trial,Defendant claimed that he acted in self-defense. The districtcourt gave a standard jury instruction on self-defense butdeclined to give Defendant’s additional requested instruction:“In the home, the need for self-defense and property defenseis most acute.” The sole question on appeal is whether theSupreme Court’s recent decisions in District of Columbia v.Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008), and McDonald v. City of Chicago,130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010), required the court to give therequested additional instruction. We answer that question“no.”
Turtle Talk 