Here is the opinion in In re Saenez: InreSeanezWrit.
An excerpt:
On August 4, 2010, you issued a legal memorandum advising the Speaker of the Navajo Nation Council that the Court in its July 16, 2010 Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, Shirley v. Morgan, No. SC-CV-02-10, exceeded its jurisdiction in a number of holdings, even though the holdings are now settled law, with the time period for reconsideration having passed and no motion for reconsideration having been filed or raised by the party Council. You advised the Navajo Nation Council that it is legal to defy our holdings, and the result was in fact defiance by the Office of the Speaker in its August 4, 2010 memorandum to Office of Navajo Government Development staff. Your legal advice runs counter to Navajo Nation law and is in violation of 7 N.N.C. §206 which imposes upon you, as a government lawyer, a duty not to obstruct interfere or otherwise influence the functions of the Navajo Nation Courts.
The court ordered Mr. Saenez to appear Friday to show cause why he should not be barred from practice in the Navajo courts.
And here is the Chief Legislative Counsel opinion at issue: Opinion_No._CLC-04-10[1]
Turtle Talk 