Due to popular demand, Washington is up next. [Lemme know if anyone objects to the W/L characterizations below. Some cases are a little difficult to figure.]
In Washington, tribal interest win 47 percent of cases
Here are the cases:
Lummi Indian Nation v. State (2010) — L
State v. Eriksen (2010) — W
State v. Cayenne (2008) — L
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. W. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hrgs. Bd. (2007) –L
Wright v. Colville Tribal Enterprise Corp. (2006) — W
Willman v. Wash. Utilities and Transp. Comm’n. (2005) — W
Interest of Mahaney (2002) — L
State v. Moses (2002) — W
State v. Buchanan (1999) — W
Confederated Chehalis Tribes v. Johnson (1998) — L
State v. Squally (1997) — L
Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Quinault Indian Nation (1996) — L
State v. Cooper (1996) — ?????
State v. L.J.M. (1996) — ?????
Estate of Cross (1995) — L
State v. Schmuck (1993) — W
Matter of Yakima River Drainage Basin (1993) — W
Adoption of Baby Boy Crews (1992) — L
Salmon for All v. Dept. of Fisheries (1992) — W
State v. McCormack (1991) — L
State v. Sohappy (1988) — W
9 wins, 10 losses
State v. Jim, a PL 280 case, is being argued next Tuesday. The State is asking the court to overturn State v. Sohappy in the process.