Here.
Interesting brief, filed in response to the SG’s invitation brief recommending denial of the petition. I wonder how many of these briefs directly insult the SG’s office. This one skirts the edge of insult, I think, questioning the candor of the SG.
Indian Country and Indian Lawyers need to understand the difference between the (capital ‘N’) Native Hawaiians that are the subject of Corboy and Rice v. Kayetano and the (small “n”) native Hawaiians who are on the sidelines watching the machinations of the large N Hawwaiians to maintain control of huge land trusts and trust revenue that the small n native Hawaiians believe belongs to them in part or in whole. When you research you need to ask yourself: Who did Congress/Administration/Judicial branches of the U.S. recognize as the “Hawaiian” Native Americans? You’ll be suprised to find out the answer. Google Hou Native Hawaiians. Remember, Hawaiian Royalty ownership of Hawaii was a colonial tool to control the resources (land) of Hawaii, as you read.