Section 1303 Tribal Court Exhaustion — Bercier v. Turtle Mountain Tribal Court

bercier-v-turtle-mountain-tribal-court

Gillette v. Edison — Younger Abstention Doctrine Applied in Disciplinary Action against Indian Lawyer

The District of North Dakota dismissed a federal action brought by an attorney seeking an order forcing North Dakota state courts to dismiss a disciplinary action against a tribal lawyer. Interesting case involving an issue about whether state bar disciplinary boards can discipline a lawyer for on-reservation conduct.

dct-order-in-gillette-v-edison

north-dakota-motion-to-dismiss

gillette-motion-for-declaratory-judgment

Standing Rock Housing Authority v. EEOC — TRO Case against Administrative Subpoena Dismissed

This case involved an administrative subpoena issued by the EEOC against the Standing Rock Housing Authority over claims of sex discrimination. The District of North Dakota declined to quash the subpoena on the grounds that the case was not ripe.

standing-rock-complaint

eeoc-motion-to-dismiss

standing-rock-response

eeoc-reply-brief

standing-rock-v-eeoc-dct-order

US v. Crow Feather — Indian Country Marijuana Indictment

The district court here (D. N.D.) declined to dismiss an indictment for marijuana possession. From the opinion:

Crow Feather contends that the Court should dismiss this action because possession of marijuana with intent to distribute is an offense that is expressly prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 1152 and is not an offense set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 1153.

***

Because 18 U.S.C. § 1152 does not restrict prosecution for a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and because Crow Feather need not commit a crime set forth in 18 U.S.C. §1153 to be prosecuted in federal court, Crow Feather’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 13) is DENIED.

us-v-crow-feather-dct-opinion

Challenge to Federal Criminalization of Hemp – D. N.D.

A federal district court in North Dakota granted the government’s motion to dismiss a claim that the United States ban on industrial hemp is unconstitutional. Here is the opinion: Monson v. DEA Opinion

The opinion relied in part on the Eighth Circuit’s decision, United States v. White Plume, involving Indians arguing that the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie protected their right to farm industrial hemp for commercial purposes.