District of North Dakota

North Dakota Federal Court Allows Challenge to Tribal TERO Suit to Proceed against TERO Officer

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials in Dakota Metal Fabrication v. Parisien (D.N.D.):

1 Complaint.pdfDownload
1-3 Motion to Dismiss.pdfDownload
6 Response.pdfDownload
9 Reply.pdfDownload
21 DCT Order.pdfDownload

Litigation in North Dakota Federal Court over Turtle Mountain TERO Power to Assess Nonmember Business on Trust Lands

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials so far in Hanson v. Parisien (D.N.D.):

1 Complaint.pdfDownload
3-1 Tribal Motion to Dismiss.pdfDownload
6 Hanson Response to MTD.pdfDownload
8 Hanson Motion for Default Judgment.pdfDownload
10 Tribal Response to Default Motion.pdfDownload
12 Hanson Reply in Support of Default.pdfDownload
17 Hanson Surreply.pdfDownload
18-1 Tribal Motion to Strike Surreply.pdfDownload
19 DCT Order Denying Motion for Default.pdfDownload

Eighth Circuit Briefs in Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation v. Dept. of the Interior [opposition to Trump-era approval of non-Indian mining on shores of Lake Sakakawea]

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

MHA Nation Opening Brief.pdfDownload
Federal Brief.pdfDownload
Slawson Brief.pdfDownload

Lower court materials here.

Screen shot from “Before and After the Flood: Property and Sovereignty at Fort Berthold.”

North Dakota DCT Dismisses Contract Claim against MHA Nation

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the order in Bird Industries Inc. v. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (D.S.D.):

30-dct-orderDownload

Prior post with briefs here.

North Dakota Federal Court Holds that Exposing Nonmember Conducting Business on Indian Land to a Suit Enforcing a Contract-Based Smoking Ban to which the Nonmember Agreed to Creates an Irreparable Harm

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Color me skeptical about the state of the Eighth Circuit’s tribal inherent powers jurisprudence if a tribal citizen who leases their land to nonmembers, who then violate the terms of that lease, cannot bring suit in tribal court to enforce the lease. Seems to me this holding is in direct conflict with the Supreme Court’s decisions ordering tribal exhaustion.

Here are the materials in WPX Energy Williston LLC v. Fettig (D.N.D.):

1 Complaint

16 Answer + Counterclaim

20 Motion to Dismiss

22 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim

24-12 MHA Nation Trial Court Decision

25 Response to 20

27 Motion for Preliminary Injunction

38 Reply in Support of 20 + Response to 27

43 Response to 22

44 Reply in Support of 27

47 Reply in Support of 22

51 DCT Order on Motion to Dismiss

50-dct-order-on-motion-for-preliminary-injunctionDownload

North Dakota Federal Court Dismisses FTCA Claim arising from BIA Road Maintenance Negligence under “Discretionary Function Exception”

Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal (and tribal) discretion at work.

Here are the materials in Mound v. United States (D.N.D.):

1 Complaint

9 Federal Motion to Dismiss

19 Response

23 Reply

32 US Post Hearing Brief

33 Mound Post Hearing Brief

32-dct-order-motion-to-dismiss-1Download

Eighth Circuit Rejects MHA Nation Citizens’ Voting Rights Suit

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the opinion in Cross v. Fox.

Briefs:

Cross Brief.pdfDownload
Tribe Brief.pdfDownload
Reply.pdfDownload

Lower court materials here.

Fort Berthold Agency

Materials in Tribal Business Partner’s Fraud/RICO Suit against MHA Nation

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials so far in Bird Industries Inc. v. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (D.S.D.):

1 Complaint

10 Amended Complaint

17 Motion to Dismiss

18-8 Arbitration Demand

18-9 AAA Arbitration Dismissal Order

25 Response

26 Reply

29 Surreply