Here:
Lower court materials here.
Eighth Circuit Briefs in Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation v. Dept. of the Interior [opposition to Trump-era approval of non-Indian mining on shores of Lake Sakakawea]
Bureau of Land Management
The Intercept: “Trump’s Pick to Manage Public Lands Has Four-Decade History of ‘Overt Racism’ Toward Native People”
Here.
Briefs in Mandan Hidatsa and Arikara Nation v. Dept. of Interior [federal approval of drilling at Fort Berthold] [updated 12/22/21]
Here are the updated briefs in Mandan Hidatsa and Arikara Nation v. Dept. of Interior (D.N.D.):
Update (12/22/21):
Prior post here.
D.C. District Court Transfers MHA Nation Suit against BLM Drilling Permit Approvals to North Dakota
Here are the materials in Mandan Hidatsa and Arikara Nation v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
10 Slawson Motion to Intervene
18 Slawson Motion to Transfer Case to DND
HuffPo: “Federal Officials Divulge Secret Info About Native American Artifacts”
Here.
Oglala Sioux Tribe Resolution Demanding BLM Consultation re: Converse County Oil and Gas Project (Wyo.)
Here:
The tribe’s press release:
OST PRESS RELEASE ON CONVERSE COUNTY OIL GAS PROJECT (3-27-18) (1)
UPDATE (4/11/2018):
FINAL AGENDA FOR GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT CONSULTATIOS (4-9-18).2
Tenth Circuit Dismisses Challenge to Hydraulic Fracking Rule as Unripe
Here is the opinion in State of Wyoming v. Zinke.
Tell Them Chaco Canyon is not For Sale (Scoping Meetings This Week)
Here:
Ninth Circuit Rejects Challenge to Federal Approval of Tule Wind Project over Eagle-Based Challenge
Here is the opinion in Protect Our Communities v. Jewell.
From the syllabus:
The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of federal agencies and officials and intervenor Tule Wind, LLC in an action challenging the Bureau of Land Management’s decision to grant a right-of-way on federal lands in southeast San Diego County, permitting Tule Wind to construct and operate a wind energy project.
Briefs:
Backcountry Against Dumps Opening Brief
Related lower court materials here.
Federal Court Grants Federal Officer Summary Judgment in Excessive Force Suit brought by Deceased Alleged Indian Graverobber
Here are the materials in Estate of Redd v. Love (D. Utah):
An excerpt:
This case arises out of Dr. James D. Redd’s tragic suicide the day after federal agents arrested him and his wife for trafficking in stolen Native American artifacts, theft of government property, and theft of tribal property. Dr. Redd’s Estate brought this Bivens action against Bureau of Land Management Agent Daniel Love. The Estate claims Agent Love violated Dr. Redd’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from the use of excessive force when Agent Love sent over fifty-three federal agents, many of whom were heavily armed and wearing bulletproof vests, to raid and search Dr. Redd’s home.
Agent Love moves for summary judgment, arguing qualified immunity shields him from the Estate’s claim. After careful consideration, the court grants Agent Love’s motion.
The estate previously survived a federal summary judgment motion, and those materials are here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.