California SCT Rules against Immunity for Tribal Sovereign Lenders

Here is the opinion in People ex rel. Owens v. Miami Nation Enterprises.

We posted briefs here.

Tribal Lender Immune from Telephone Consumer Protection Act Suit

Here are the materials in Finn v. Great Plains Lending LLC (W.D. Okla.):

15 Motion to Dismiss

16 Response

18 Reply

DCT Order

Florida Court Affirms Immunity of Tribally-Owned LLC

Here is the opinion in Monahan v. Great Plains Lending, LLC (Fla. Cir. Ct.):

ca15-0449_order_granting_defendant_great_plains_lending_

 

E.D. Pennsylvannia Dismisses Claim Against Tribal Lender

Download memorandum here.

Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss in Finn v. Great Plains Lending (E.D. Penn. Feb. 23, 2016) for lack of jurisdiction.

Connecticut Court Recognizes Tribal Immunity, Remands to Allow Conn. Regulatory to Determine Whether Immunity Extends to Tribal Lender

Here are the materials in Great Plains Lending LLC v. State of Connecticut Dept. of Banking (Conn. Super.):

Opinion

Briefs here.

Federal Court Dismisses Suit against Tribal Lending Entity Owned by Tunica-Biloxi Tribe

Here are the materials in Everette v. Mitchum (D. Md.):

21 MobiLoans Motion to Dismiss

22-1 Riverbend Finance Motion to Dismiss

30-1 Mitchem Motion to Dismiss

40 Response to MobiLoans

41 Response to 3052 Mitchem Reply

53 Riverbend Finance Reply

57 MobiLoans Reply

59-1 Scott Tucker Motion to Dismiss

60 Response to 59

62 Everette v. Mitchem (D.MD) Memorandum Order

Briefs in Great Plains Lending LLC v. State of Connecticut Dept. of Banking

Here:

Great Plains Brief

Dept of Banking Brief

Reply

Otoe-Missouria Chairman’s Section 1983 Suit against Connecticut Banking Commissioner Dismissed

Here are the materials in Shotton v. Pitkin (W.D. Okla.):

1 Complaint

12 Motion to Dismiss

20 Response

23 Reply

26 DCT Order

Otoe-Missouria Tribal Chairman Brings Civil Rights Action against Connecticut Dept. of Banking

Here is the complaint in Shotton v. Pitkin (W.D. Okla.):

1 Complaint

An excerpt:

Plaintiff brings this action as a result of unlawful enforcement actions taken by Defendants against Plaintiff and Defendants’ entry of a state administrative order imposing a civil penalty of $700,000 against Plaintiff in his individual capacity and unlawfully restraining his conduct without due process of law and in violation of his individual right to immunity as a tribal official.

Our post on a related suit in Connecticut Superior Court action is here.

Otoe-Missouria Tribal Lender Appeals Connecticut Dept. of Banking Fines

Here are the materials in Great Plains Lending LLC v. Connecticut Dept. of Banking (Conn. Super.):

Complaint

Motion for TRO

News coverage here: “Oklahoma tribe appeals $1.5 million in payday lending fines.”