Here are the materials in this case, in which the district court refused to dismiss a Bivens claim against tribal police. It was apparently argued on the same day last November as Bressi v. Ford (materials here):
There seems to be a rash of federal civil rights cases against tribal police (see also Jeanlouis v. Vidallia) under a wide variety of theories — FTCA, Sections 1981, 1982, 1985, and now Bivens. The Bivens claim is most unpredictable, of course, given that it is unprecedented as against tribal police. I’m sure insurers should be aware of this kind of claim and may be watching carefully.
2 thoughts on “Murgia v. Reed — CA9 Materials in Bivens Claim against Tribal Officers”
Comments are closed.