Boyd v. Emerald Queen Casino — No Section 1983 Claim in Tribal Trespass Case

Here is the opinion; actually, an order to show cause — Boyd v. Emerald Queen Casino.

An excerpt:

Mr. Boyd purports to sue the Emerald Queen Casino, a security guard at the Emerald Queen Casino, and tribal officers of the Puyallup Indian Tribe for false imprisonment after a charge of criminal trespass was brought against him in Tacoma Municipal Court. Dkt. 5, p. 3. Mr. Boyd alleges that a “Puyallup Tribal officer along with employees of the Emerald Queen had worked together … to charge [him] with a crime of criminal trespassing in the first degree in Tacoma Municipal Court (Case # B00229679) which was Dismissed with Prejudice.” Id. Mr. Boyd further alleges that this has “created false imprisonment,” that he has lost his reputation, “which has become cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th Amendment, and that he has been discriminated against. Id

One thought on “Boyd v. Emerald Queen Casino — No Section 1983 Claim in Tribal Trespass Case

Comments are closed.