Here are the materials in Lummi Tribe v. Whidbey Telephone Co. (W.D. Wash.):
Prior post here.

Here is the complaint in Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. National Marine Fisheries Service (W.D. Wash.):

Here are the materials so far in Lummi Tribe v. Whidbey Telephone Co. (W.D. Wash.):
From the tribe:
The Lummi Nation filed a federal lawsuit against Whidbey Telecom, Whatcom County, and the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Commerce alleging a multi-year pattern of federally funded broadband construction that repeatedly trenched through known ancestral burial grounds at Point Roberts, disturbing and destroying human remains while flouting mandatory tribal consultation and stop-work obligations under federal law. Ten days later, the Nation filed an emergency motion for a preliminary injunction supported by sworn declarations revealing that defendants assessed less than one percent of the construction area, that hundreds of ancestors’ remains may have been harmed by heavy equipment, and that the county admitted in writing to improperly issuing permits — seeking a court order to halt construction and compel full site access for recovery and reburial.

Here are the materials in Frank’s Landing Indian Community v. Enlow (W.D. Wash.):

Here is the unpublished opinion in Stillaguamish Indian Tribe v. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe.
Briefs here.

Here:
Questions presented:
Whether Rule 19 requires dismissal of APA suits challenging federal agency action whenever a nonparty who benefited from that action asserts sovereign immunity.

Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in the consolidated cases, Makah Indian Tribe v. Exxon Mobile Corp. (W.D. Wash.) and Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe v. Exxon Mobile Corp. (W.D. Wash.):

You must be logged in to post a comment.