Here are the materials in United States v. Washington, subproceeding 89-03 (W.D. Wash.):
Tulalip Tribes
Three Tribes Withdraw Laches as a Defense in US v. Washington Subproceeding 17-03
Here are the notices of withdrawal of laches as a defense in United States v. Washington subproceeding 17-03 (W.D. Wash.):
Sub 17-03 Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Notice of Withdrawal of Laches Defense 011921
Sub 17-03 The Tulalip Tribes Withdrawal of Laches Defense 011921
Sub 17-03 Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Withdrawal of Laches Defense 011921
As I wrote in 2015, I see this as a good thing — the possibility that the laches defense could be used against tribal treaty rights has hung like a smoggy haze over Indian country ever since 2005. It staggers me to think that tribes would do this to themselves for short-term, and probably illusory, gain.
Wash. Appeals Court Orders New Trial in Snohomish County Deputy’s Killing of Tulalip Man
Here are the materials in Lacy v. Snohomish County (Wash. Ct. App.):
4-15-19 Appellant’s Opening Brief
5-17-19 Respondent Cross Appellant’s Brief
6-14-19 Appellant’s Reply Brief
Prior post here.
Briefs in Lummi Crab Fishing Case
Here are the new materials in United States v. Washington (W.D. Wash.), subproceeding 19-01:
Prior post here.
Tulalip Tribes Enter Into Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement with State of Washington re: Quil Ceda Village
Here is news coverage.
Federal Court Enjoins Lummi Tribe’s Proposed Winter Crab Fishing
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington (W.D. Wash.), subproceeding no. 19-01:
1-motion-for-leave-to-file.pdf
3-request-for-determination.pdf
8-swinomish-motion-for-tro.pdf
13-upper-skagit-motion-for-tro.pdf
State Criminal Fishing Case against Hazen Shopbell Dismissed
Federal Court Rejects Effort by Sauk-Suiattle to Reopen US v. Washington 93-01 Subproceeding
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington (W.D. Wash.), subproceeding 93-01:
183-stipulated-settlement-2.pdf
333-sauk-suiattle-motion-to-vacate.pdf
Stillaguamish Marine U&A Allowed to Proceed [U.S. v. Washington Subproceeding 17-03]
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington [subproceeding 17-03] or Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. State of Washington (W.D. Wash.):
60 Motion for Reconsideration of Contempt Motion
61 DCT Order Denying Reconsideration
70 Jamestown & Port Gamble Response
74 Stillaguamish Response to 65
75 Stillaguamish Response to 64 & 66
Prior post here.
Tulalip Indian Wrongful Death/County Police Excessive Force Case Heads to Trial
Here are the materials in Lacy v. Snohomish County (Wash. Super. Ct.):
28 05-30-17 Second Amended Complaint
67 6-22-18 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
72 7-9-18 Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Summary Judgment Motion
74 7-16-18 Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
78 7-24-18 Order on Summary Judgment
95 8-9-18 Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Reconsideration
96 8-14-18 Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
98 8- 25-18 Motion to Stay Trial Date and Certify for Discretionary Review
104 8-31-18 Plaintiff’s Response to Motion to Stay Trial Date and Certify for Discretionary Review
105 9-5-18 Defendant’s Reply on Motion to Stay Trial Date and Certify for Discretionary Review
110 9-5-18 Order Denying Motion to Stay Trial Date and Certify for Discretionary Review
