Washington Federal Court Declines to Intervene in State Court Dispute Involving Frank’s Landing

Here are the materials in Frank’s Landing Indian Community v. Enlow (W.D. Wash.):

California Federal Court Allows Round Valley to Sue Mendocino County + Sheriff over Weed Raids

Here are the materials in Round Valley Indian Tribes v. Kendall (N.D. Cal.):

Prior post here.

Update (2/25/26):

Round Valley Indian Tribe + Citizens Sue Mendocino + Humboldt Counties over Weed Raids

Here is the complaint in James v. Kendall (N.D. Cal.):

Federal Court Complaint Filed re: Cannabis Raid at Round Valley

Here is the complaint in Cordova v. Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office (N.D. Cal.):

Ryan Stoa on the Tribal Cannabis Agriculture

Ryan Stoa has posted “Tribal Cannabis Agriculture Law,” forthcoming in the Utah Law Review, on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Indian tribes have some freedom to develop their own approach to cannabis agriculture, but what is the nature of that freedom, and how have tribes acted upon it? This Article investigates the current legal framework surrounding tribal cannabis agriculture and tribal participation in legal cannabis markets. It is generally believed that tribes have some freedom to determine the legality of cannabis cultivation on their lands, and to create rules and regulations governing that practice. However, this freedom is nascent and inconsistently granted by the federal government. In addition, the legal frameworks tribes are developing with respect to cannabis agriculture are still evolving and poorly understood, since each tribe is free to craft their own unique approach to the cannabis industry. This Article examines the current tribal cannabis agriculture landscape in several ways. First, a big-picture snapshot of the U.S. cannabis industry in 2023 is provided in order to place tribal cannabis policies in an appropriate context. Second, the Article attempts to discern the federal government’s opaque perspective on tribal cannabis law, including the contours of tribal freedom to self-regulate in this area. Third, the Article identifies trends and approaches to tribal cannabis agriculture that have emerged to date, with examples of cannabis policies from tribes around the country. Finally, a case study of the Hoopa Valley Tribe is presented in order to bring to life the legal complexities of this topic.

California COA Briefs in California Capitalism Association v. Marston

Here:

Paul Mooney on Cannabis in Indian Country

Paul Mooney has published “Making Marijuana Less Illegal: Challenges for Native American Tribes Entering the Marijuana Market” in the South Dakota Law Review.

Today — High Crimes: Marijuana Law in South Dakota and Beyond, Law Review Symposium 2021

Monday, October 25th, 2021 | 8:45am – 4:00pm CT | All events will occur as a webcast

2:00pm EST / 1:00pm CT | Panel: Tribes Entering the Marijuana Industry

https://turtletalk.blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/high-crimes-marijuana-law-in-south-dakota-and-beyond-law-review-symposium-2021-5-1.pdf

New Scholarship on Taxing Indian Country Cannabis

Mark J. Cowan has posted “Taxing Cannabis on the Reservation,” forthcoming in the American Business Law Journal, on SSRN.

The abstract:

American Indian tribes that enter the cannabis industry confront a multi-sovereign tax system that lacks certainty and horizontal equity. The complex interaction of state legalization and taxation of cannabis, federal tax law, the status of tribes as both governments and business enterprises, and the legal and tax landscape in Indian country can give tribes tax advantages and disadvantages compared to off-reservation cannabis dispensaries. This article analyzes these tax issues, examines them in the context of prior challenges posed by Indian gaming, and suggests reforms that address the tax inequities that can result from cannabis sales on Indian reservations.

Pleadings in Navajo Nation v. Benally [industrial hemp]

Here are the pleadings in Navajo Nation v. Benally (Shiprock D.Ct.):

2020_06_12_Navajo_v_Benally___Complaint_3

2020_06_29_Navajo_v_Benally___Plaintiff_s_Motion_for_TRO_and_PI

2020_07_06_Navajo_v_Benally___Defendant_s_Motion_to_Dismiss

2020_07_06_Navajo_v_Benally___Defendant_s_Opposition_to_TRO_and_PI

2020_07_21_Navajo_v_Benally___Plaintiff_s_Reply_in_Support_of_TRO_and_PI

2020_07_21_Navajo_v_Benally_Plaintiff_s_Brief_in_Opposition_to_Motion_to_Dismiss

2020_08_20_Navajo_v_Benally___Defendant_s_Supplemental_Jurisdiction_Brief

2020_08_20_Navajo_v_Benally___Plaintiff_s_Supplemental_Brief_on_Jurisdition_3

2020_08_20_Navajo_v_Benally___Plaintiff_s_Supplemental_Brief_on_Jurisdition_Exhibit_3___USDA_letter_denying_Benally_hemp_plan

2020_09_10_NN_v._Dineh_Benally___Order_denying_Defendant_s_Motion_to_Dismiss

SR_CV_014_20_Order_Granting_Plaintiff_s_Motion_for_Temporary_Restraining_Order_and_Preliminary_Injunction_1

Other pleadings here.