Second Motion to Compel in Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Van Hunnik

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

98 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel

An excerpt:

The only information that Interrogatory No. 11 seeks to discover is whether Judge Davis discussed any 48-hour procedures with other judges on the Seventh Judicial Circuit. It is difficult to imagine an interrogatory more related to Plaintiffs’ burden of proof than Interrogatory No. 11. See Disc. Op. at *6 (“In this case, in order to be successful, plaintiffs must prove the defendants engaged in policies, practices and customs which violate the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights.”).

Materials on prior motion to compel is here.

One thought on “Second Motion to Compel in Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Van Hunnik”

  1. Pingback: Update in South Dakota ICWA Class Action — Is Judge Davis Concealing Evidence? | Turtle Talk

Comments are closed.