SCOTUS Confirms Constitutional Birthright Citizenship Right over Four Dissenters

Here is the opinion in Trump v. Barbara.

One excerpt, suggesting Indians are like diplomats, what I’ve been saying all along, dammit:

Page 5 (majority)

Another, more explicitly, on Indians as diplomats:

Page 12 (majority)

Another on the government’s ridiculousness re: Elk v. Wilkins:

Page 23 n. 5 (majority)

From Justice Jackson’s concurrence, the only intellectually honest opinion from this rat’s nest of white supremacy:

Page 17-18 (Jackson, J., concurring)

On why birthright citizenship is an issue in 2026:

Page 19 (Jackson, J., concurring)

On the Indian Citizenship Act:

Page 15 n. 5 (Jackson, J., concurring)

The possible seeds for an undoing of the contemptible Elk v. Wilkins decision, which also rested on Dred Scott:

Page 20 (Jackson, J., concurring)

Justice Thomas’ dissent (the principal dissent) waxed on and on about “tribal Indians,” leading (I suggest) to at least two conclusions: (1) the United States does not have the power to tax “tribal Indians”; (2) the right of tribal self-government derives from international customary law (here comes UNDRIP!); and (3) Elk is wrong:

Pages 24-26 (Thomas, J., dissenting)

More Elk is wrong fodder:

Page 30-31 (Thomas, J., dissenting)

More on Elk, though in reliance this time:

Pages 36-37 (Thomas, J., dissenting)

On the Indian Citizenship Act:

Page 41 n. 7 (Thomas, J., dissenting)

Wha?? China is less or equally alien than the Cherokee Nation?

Page 62-63 (Thomas, J., dissenting)

Tribal Indians” in same category as diplomats and “hostile alien occupiers” — this is getting weird:

Page 65 (Thomas, J., dissenting)

Nothing from me on Kavanaugh or Alito, who don’t merit attention.