Amicus Brief of NCAI in Census Case

Here is the National Congress of American Indians’ (“NCAI”) Amicus Brief in Trump v. New York, which is being argued today and addresses whether unauthorized immigrants should now be excluded from the Census count.

From the brief:

Multiple amici argue, in effect, that unauthorized immigrants are not “persons” to be counted for purposes of apportionment. Because the United States once tried to argue that American Indians were not “persons” under the law, amicus NCAI is compelled to refute these arguments.

….

These arguments are inconsistent with the Constitution’s text and history. Worse still, in a nation where “all persons are created equal,” Matthews v. Lucas, 427 U.S. 495, 516 (1976) (Stevens, J., dissenting), see also Declaration of Independence ¶ 2 (“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. . . .”), these attempts to deny the very personhood of unauthorized immigrants are morally bankrupt.

Amended Complaint in Census Case involving Navajo and Gila River

Here, in National Urban League v. Ross (N.D. Cal.):

2020 09 01 (61) Amended Complaint

UCLA Preliminary Report on Census 2020 and 2010 Response Rates on American Indian Reservations

Here:

PRESS RELEASE US Census Response Rates on American Indian Reservations in the 2020 Census

US Census Response Rates on American Indian Reservations in the 2020 Census and in the 2010 Census 051520 Final