Here are the materials in Godfrey v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Cobell v. Jewell
D.C. Circuit Decides Expenses Appeal in Cobell v. Jewell
Here is the opinion.
An excerpt:
This is the eleventh appeal to this court in nearly two decades of litigation arising out of the Department of the Interior’s misadministration of Native American trust accounts and an ensuing complex, nationwide litigation and settlement. As the case winds down, the class action representatives have appealed the district court’s denial of compensation for expenses incurred during the litigation and settlement process.
We affirm the district court’s denial of additional compensation for expenses for the lead plaintiff, Elouise Cobell, because the district court expressly wrapped those costs into an incentive award given to her earlier. We conclude, however, that the district court erred in categorically rejecting as procedurally barred the class representatives’ claim for the recovery of third-party payments, and remand for the district court to apply its accumulated expertise and discretion to the question of whether third-party compensation can and should be paid under the Settlement Agreement.
Briefs here.
Lower court materials here.
D.C. Circuit Briefs in Effort to Recover Litigation Expenses from Cobell Settlement Fund
Federal Court Denies Litigation Expenses Motion (Again?)
Here are the new materials in Cobell v. Jewell (D.D.C.):
Prior order here.
Indian Land Tenure Foundation Upcoming CLE on Cobell v. Jewell: July 16, 2014 in Washington, D.C.
Federal Court Denies Motion to Recover Cobell Litigation Expenses
Here are the materials:
An excerpt:
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration of Class Representatives’ Expense Application [ECF No. 3839]. The motion seeks to have this Court reconsider its June 20, 2011 decision declining to further diminish the common fund benefitting class plaintiffs by granting the Class Representatives’ request to recover expenses related to recoverable grants third-party organizations made to the Blackfeet Reservation Development Fund (“BRDF”) to finance this lawsuit. Because the pending motion advances arguments and evidence that could have been raised by the plaintiffs before the Court ruled and entered judgment, the motion will be denied.


You must be logged in to post a comment.