Federal Court Dismisses Complaint Asking an Order to Force Oneida Business Committee to Hold Meeting on Per Caps

Here are the materials in Dallas v. Hill (E.D. Wis.):

11 Amended Complaint

16 Motion to Dismiss

20 Opposition

22 Reply

25 DCT Order

Menominee Tribe Challenge to Back 40 Mine Dismissed

Here are the materials in Menominee Indian Tribe v. EPA (E.D. Wis.):

1 Complaint

7 EPA Motion to Dismiss

14 Aquila Motion to Intervene

21 Aquila Motion to Dismiss

21 Combined Response

22 Aquila Reply

23 EPA Reply

31 EPA Supplemental Brief

32 Aquila Supplemental Brief

33 Tribe Supplemental Brief

35 Tribe Motion to Amend Complaint

38 Aquila Opposition to Motion to Amend

39 EPA Opposition to Motion to Amend

40 Reply in Support of Motion to Amend

42 DCT Order

More materials on the mine here and here.

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Employment Action against Oneida Housing

Here are the materials in Delebreau v. Danforth:


Opening Brief

Response Brief


Lower court materials here.

Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment in Wisconsin Oneida Reservation Boundaries Case

Here are the materials in Oneida Nation v. Village of Hobart (E.D. Wis.):

94 Hobart Motion for Summary J

96 Oneida Motion for Summary J

102 Hobart Response

104 Oneida Response

116 Oneida Reply

119 Reply

126 US Amicus Brief

Prior post here.

Federal Court Grants Full Faith and Credit to Wisconsin Oneida Family Court Judgment

Here are the materials in The Chesapeake Life Insurance Co. v. Parker (E.D. Wis.):

13 Defendant_s Motion for Summary J

22 Skenandore Response

23 Parker Response

24 Reply

28 DCT Order Denying MSJ

34 DCT Order

Federal Court Dismisses Employee Action against Wisconsin Oneida

Here are the materials in Delebreau v. Danforth (E.D. Wis.):

39 motion to dismiss

45 response

48 opposition

49 reply

56 dct order

Materials (So Far) in Oneida Nation v. Village of Hobart


1 Complaint

5 Oneida Motion for PI

10 Amended Complaint

25 Oneida Motion for Summary J

46 DCT Order on Preliminary Motions

60 Oneida Motion to Clarify

62 Hobart Response to Motion to Clarify

65 Oneida Reply re Motion to Clarify

66 DCT Order on Burdens of Proof

Federal Court Dismisses Pro Se Action against Interior and Stockbridge-Munsee

Here are the materials in Bruette v. Secretary of the Interior (E.D. Wis.):

10 Motion to Dismiss

13 Amended Motion to Dismiss

15 Opposition

16 Reply

17 DCT Order

Federal Court Dismisses Wisconsin Oneida Suit over Renewable Energy

Here are the materials in Oneida Seven Generations Corporation v. City of Green Bay (E.D. Wis.):

10 Green Bay Motion to Dismiss

14 Opposition to 10

17 Reply

19 DCT Order

An excerpt:

Plaintiffs Oneida Seven Generations Corporation (OSGC) and Green Bay Renewable Energy, LLC, (GBRE) filed this action against the City of Green Bay pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging the City violated their rights to substantive and procedural due process when the Common Council voted to revoke a conditional use permit it had granted only one year earlier. The case is before the Court on the City’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules for Civil Procedure. The City also contends that the complaint fails to allege facts showing GBRE has any interest or suffered any loss in the transaction and that OSGC lacks capacity to sue under the laws of the Oneida Nation under which it was chartered. For these reasons, as well, the City argues that the claims against it should be dismissed.