MSU Press Release on “Race and American Indian Tribal Nationhood”

Native Americans stuck in a political irony

Contact: Kristen Parker, University Relations, Office: (517) 353-8942, Cell: (517) 980-0709, Kristen.Parker@ur.msu.edu; Matthew Fletcher, College of Law, Office: (517) 432-6909, fletchem@law.msu.edu

Published: Oct. 17, 2011

Socio-economic and environmental problems are at an all-time high, says Matthew Fletcher, director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center at the MSU College of Law. The answer: A change in tribal membership codes so that non-American Indians are held accountable.

His study, “Race and American Indian Tribal Nationhood,” was recently published in Wyoming Law Review.

Continue reading

Fletcher on “Race and American Indian Tribal Nationhood” — UPDATED

“Race and American Indian Tribal Nationhood” is available for download here. [The paper is there now, sorry.]

Here is the abstract:

Modern American Indian nations face a racial paradox. On one hand, the citizenry of Indian nations is almost exclusively based in race, ethnicity, and ancestry. Indian nations would not be “Indian” without this basis. But American constitutional principles dictate that laws based on racial, ethnic, or ancestral classifications are highly disfavored. For Indian nations, this means that Indian governments have virtually no authority to regulate the activities of the non-Indian citizens that live amongst Indian communities. This paper offers a long-term solution to this conundrum, a solution that requires Indian nations and American courts and policymakers to modernize understandings about American Indian tribal nationhood. American Indian law and policy forced Indian nations into a legal status akin to “domestic racial nations.” By tweaking Indian citizenship requirements, and recognizing the national character of modern Indian nations, modern Indian nations should more properly be understood as simply “domestic nations,” much like Monaco and The Vatican.

Constructive feedback welcome.