Federal Court Rejects Tribal Challenge to Keystone XL Pipeline Permit, Asks for More Briefing on Constitutional Questions

Here are the updated materials in the case now captioned Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Trump (D. Mont.):

93 DCT Order with Questions

95 TransCanada Response to DCT Questions

97 TransCanada MSJ

101 US Response to DCT Questions

109 US MSJ

111 Response to 97

114 Plaintiffs MSJ

120 Plaintiffs Motion for PI

126 TransCanada Response to 120

127 US Response to 120

131 Plaintiffs Motion for TRO

134 TransCanada Response to 114

136 Reply in Support of 97

137 Plaintiffs Response to 109

139 US Response to 114

141 TransCanada Response to 131

142 Plaintiffs Reply in Support of 120

143 US Response to 131

144 Plaintiffs Reply in Support of 114

145 US Reply in Support of 109

150 Plaintiffs Reply in Support of 131

167 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Federal Court Vacates Keystone XL Permit, Orders Remand to Federal Agency

Here is the order in Northern Plains Resource Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (D. Mont.):

130 DCT Order

Briefs in Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Trump here.

Most Claims against Federal Approvals of Keystone XL Allowed to Proceed

Here is the order in Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Trump (D. Mont.):

92 DCT Order

Briefs here.

Briefs in Rosebud Sioux Tribe and Fort Belknap Indian Community v. Trump (Keystone XL)

Here are the briefs on the United States’ and TransCanada’s Motions to Dismiss Rosebud and Fort Belknap’s treaty and jurisdiction claims regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline.

News coverage here, and more information here.  Previous posts on this case are here.

Amended Complaint in Keystone XL Challenge

Here is the pleading in Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Trump (D. Mont.):

Doc. 51-1 Proposed Amended Complaint

Other Keystone XL posts here.