Most Claims against Federal Approvals of Keystone XL Allowed to Proceed

Here is the order in Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Trump (D. Mont.):

92 DCT Order

Briefs here.

South Dakota “Riot Boosting” Law Enjoined

Here are the materials in Dakota Rural Action v. Noem (D.S.D.):

9-motion-for-preliminary-injunction.pdf

24-motion-to-dismiss-sheriff-thom.pdf

28-motion-for-judgment-on-pleadings.pdf

36-response-to-24.pdf

38-reply-in-support-of-9.pdf

39-reply-in-support-of-24.pdf

40-reply-in-support-of-28.pdf

43-1-surreply.pdf

dkt-49-order-dismissing-sheriff-thom.pdf

dkt-50-order-granting-preliminary-injunction.pdf

Complaint posted here.

Briefs in Rosebud Sioux Tribe and Fort Belknap Indian Community v. Trump (Keystone XL)

Here are the briefs on the United States’ and TransCanada’s Motions to Dismiss Rosebud and Fort Belknap’s treaty and jurisdiction claims regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline.

News coverage here, and more information here.  Previous posts on this case are here.

Amended Complaint in Keystone XL Challenge

Here is the pleading in Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Trump (D. Mont.):

Doc. 51-1 Proposed Amended Complaint

Other Keystone XL posts here.

Ninth Circuit Motions Panel Denies TransCanada’s Motion for Stay in Challenge to Keystone XL Pipeline

Here is the order in Indigenous Environmental Network v. Dept. of State:

ca9-order-denying-motion-for-stay.pdf

Briefs:

transcanada-motion-for-stay.pdf

indigenous-environmental-network-opposition.pdf

northern-plains-opposition.pdf

fort-peck-amicus-brief.pdf

transcanada-reply.pdf