Here are the materials in Dakota Rural Action v. Noem (D.S.D.):
Complaint posted here.
Here are the briefs on the United States’ and TransCanada’s Motions to Dismiss Rosebud and Fort Belknap’s treaty and jurisdiction claims regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline.
- TransCanada Motion to Dismiss
- US Motion to Dismiss
- Rosebud and Fort Belknap Response
- US Reply
- TransCanada Reply
Here is the opinion in In re Application No. OP-0003:
From High Country News, here is “South Dakota pushes bills to prosecute ‘riot-boosting’ ahead of pipeline construction.”
Previous posts/filings here.
WaPo coverage here.
Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief is GRANTED. The Court enjoins Federal Defendants and TransCanada from engaging in any activity in furtherance of the construction or operation of Keystone and associated facilities until the Department has completed a supplement to the 2014 SEIS that complies with the requirements of NEPA and the APA.