VAWA Senate Floor Debate

Here. (pdf, 39 pgs). Additional press coverage here.

A few excerpts:

Sen. Akaka:

This bill’s tribal provisions address the epidemic rates of violence against Native women by enabling VAWA pro- grams to more directly and promptly respond to their concerns and needs. These tribal provisions are critical to the lives of Native women and doubly important to me as chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs and a Native Hawaiian.

Native women are 21⁄2 times more likely than other U.S. women to be battered or raped. These are extremely disturbing statistics: 34 percent of Native women will be raped in their life- times and 39 percent will suffer domes- tic violence. That is more than one out of every three Native women. We must come together to put a stop to this.

Last summer I chaired an oversight hearing entitled ‘‘Native Women—Protecting, Shielding, and Safeguarding Our Sisters, Mothers, and Daughters.’’ I heard the heartbreaking stories that lie behind the grim and troubling statistics on violence against American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian women.

My committee heard from the chief of the Catawba Nation, who gave a moving account of his experience growing up with domestic violence and the impact it had on the women and children in his community. He also spoke of the importance of reauthorizing VAWA.

We heard from officials who described how existing laws are failing Native women. We heard, for example, that women in tribal communities live in a confusing and dangerous jurisdictional maze, in which the absence of clear lines of authority often leads to offenders, many of whom are non-Native men, escaping investigation and prosecution, to say nothing of punishment. This outrageous and unacceptable situation has led to repeated offenses against Native women that too often spiral into violence with tragic consequences for the women, their children, and their communities.

My committee also heard that Native women are being increasingly targeted by the sex-trafficking industry and that many have, according to police reports in tribal communities across the country, simply vanished into this terrible underworld. The draft bill to address violence against Native women was circulated to a wide range of stakeholders for feedback. This led to strengthened provisions in the draft bill which I introduced as S. 1763, the Stand Against Violence and Empower Native Women Act.

Continue reading

VAWA Passes Senate without Republican Changes

Here.

Additional coverage:
Indian Country Today
Washington Post
NY Times

Statement of Sen. Akaka
Press Release from NCAI

A personal favorite–Fem 2.0
“After all my reading I’m still loss as to why Republicans do not trust tribal courts.”

Statement of Senator Udall on VAWA

There is a lot of coverage of VAWA out today as it’s debated on the Senate floor. Here is Senator Udall’s statement. (pdf)

ETA–the Senate passed VAWA 68-31.

Senate Passes Apology Resolution

From the NYTs:

The Senate has approved a resolution apologizing to American Indians for years of “ill-conceived policies” and acts of violence by United States citizens. Lawmakers said the resolution, included in a military spending bill, was a symbolic gesture meant to promote a renewed commitment to tribal communities. It was introduced by Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, and Byron L. Dorgan, Democrat of North Dakota. The Senate approved a similar resolution in 2008, but the House did not act on it. Lawmakers are also developing legislation to improve health care and public safety on reservations.

Michigan Legislative Alert

From Great Lakes, Great Michigan:

STATE SENATE ‘PROTECTION’ PLAN WOULD DRAIN MICHIGAN’S RIVERS

---

A proposed Great Lakes protection package being considered in the State Senate would allow large water users to drain huge percentages of some of Michigan’s finest rivers and streams, according to an analysis by the Great Lakes, Great Michigan coalition.

“The Senate bills would rely heavily on a newly developed water withdrawal assessment tool, discounting input from local communities and other sources, including experts in the field,” said James Clift of the Michigan Environmental Council. Clift was part of an advisory council that worked for 18 months to develop the assessment tool. Meanwhile, a contrasting package of Great Lakes protection bills in the State House provides multiple safeguards for Michigan’s waters that reach beyond the assessment tool to apply reasonable use determinations and review of resource harm. Both packages include approval of the Great Lakes Compact, an eight-state agreement banning major diversions from the lakes.

The Au Sable River, one of America’s best trout streams, could see allowable reductions in stream flow of 22 percent in some stretches under the assessment tool. “That’s outrageous,” said Rusty Gates, owner of Gates Au Sable Lodge near Grayling and president of Anglers of the Au Sable. “There’s no way you can take that much water out of a stream and not destroy it. I’m sure there are plenty of people and corporations who’d like to get their hands on the Au Sable’s spring-fed water, but the State Legislature shouldn’t be helping them do it.”

Stretches of other streams could see flow reductions in excess of 40 percent. “The Senate version of this legislation appears to recognize the value of thriving fish species in our coldwater streams, but relies heavily on the predictions of a newly created and imperfect modeling tool which, for example, would allow approximately a quarter to a third of the summer low flow of a trout stream to be withdrawn,” said Dr. Bryan Burroughs, executive director of the Michigan Council of Trout Unlimited. “Certainly this falls short of the intended spirit of the legislation, which is supposed to assure that future water withdrawals do not have an adverse impact on our natural resources. We expect that these shortfalls will be addressed if the bills are to receive widespread support.”

The Senate Legislation, relying on the assessment tool, would allow stream flow reductions of the following percentage in certain stretches of these rivers and streams:

  • 42 percent, Betsie River
  • 22 percent, Pere Marquette River
  • 25 percent, Sturgeon River
  • 22 and 16 percent, Au Sable River
  • 22 percent, Manistee River
  • 25 percent, Boardman River
  • 16 percent, Pigeon River
  • 25 percent, Jordan River

“The numbers prove that the assessment tool should be used exactly for what it was intended – as a tool, not the sole means of determining whether water users can responsibly pump huge quantities of water from the ground,” said Clift. “Balanced legislation, like that proposed under the House plan, puts multiple safeguards in place for Michigan’s water.”

For more information, visit the Great Lakes, Great Michigan website at www.greatlakesgreatmichigan.org