State of New Mexico v. Aamodt

Tenth Circuit Dismisses Objectors’ Appeal of Pojoaque Valley Water Settlement

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the opinion in State of New Mexico v. Aamodt.

Briefs:

Answering Brief for the United States of America

Appellant’s Consolidated Reply Brief to Appellees’ and Appellees in Intervention’s Briefs

Appellant’s Opening Brief

Appellant’s Supplemental Brief Pursuant to the Court’s April 5, 2018 Order

Appellee’s Answer Brief

Joint Answer Brief of Defendants-Appellees Santa Fe County and City of Santa Fe

Joint Supplemental Brief of Appellees State of New Mexico, Santa Fe County, City of Santa Fe and Rio de Tesuque Association, Inc.

Joint Supplemental Brief of Appellees the United States, Pueblo of Nambé, Pueblo of Pojoaque, Pueblo de San Ildefonso, and Pueblo de Tesuque

Response Brief of Appellee the Rio De Tesuque Association, Inc.

D. N.M. Denies Motion to Amend Judgment in Water Rights Settlement

Sarah M Donnelly

Here are the materials in the matter of New Mexico et al v. Aamodt el al, 66-cv-00639 (D. N.M. Sept. 9, 2016):

Doc. 9972 – Response in Opposition to Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Entry of Proposed Partial Final Judgment and Decree

Doc. 10543 – Memorandum Opinion and Order Approving Settlement Agreement

Doc. 10567 – Opposed Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)

Doc. 10581 – Plaintiffs-In-Intervention the United States, Pueblo de Nambé, Pueblo de Pojoaque, Pueblo de San Ildefonso, and Pueblo de Tesuque’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(E)

Doc. 10632 – Reply in Support of Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)

Doc. 10858 – Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Opposed Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)