Hunt Construction Group v. Oneida Indian Nation

In this short order, the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court reads the tribal waiver of sovereign immunity closely, holding that while the portion of the contract that reads

defendant “hereby expressly, unequivocally, and irrevocably waives its sovereign immunity from suit solely for the limited purpose of enforcement of the terms of this Agreement”

does indeed waive the Nation’s sovereign immunity in this matter, the portion that reads

[defendant] hereby consents to submit to personal jurisdiction of those courts of the State of New York and of the United States with competent subject matter jurisdiction located in the City of Syracuse, New York and the parties agree that all actions related to this Agreement shall be brought or defended in such courts ” (emphasis added).

means that the suit can only be brought in the City of Syracuse, not in Oneida County. This order overturns the lower court ruling which denied dismissal.

Hunt Construction Group v. Oneida Indian Nation

Mullally v. Havasu Landing Casino — FLMA Claim Against Tribal Casino

The district court for the Central District of California dismissed the FMLA claim on grounds of sovereign immunity. Other claims, including defamation, were dismissed without prejudice on the tribal court exhaustion doctrine. And, under tribal law, the casino immunity was waived.

havasu-landing-motion-to-dismiss

mullally-opposition-to-motion

mullally-opposition-to-motion-part-2

havasu-landing-reply-brief

mullally-v-havasu-landing-casino-dct-order