USET Gaming Resolution Opposing Exclusivity Agreements Infringing on Neighboring Tribes

Here.

WHEREAS,

 certain gaming Tribes, in order to eliminate competition, have sought to constrain the ability of neighboring nations to conduct Class III gaming on their lands by obtaining from the state government a promise of “geographic exclusivity” pursuant to which the state agrees to not allowany Class III gaming on all or a portion of the lands of such neighboring Indian nations; and
WHEREAS,
 such agreements blatantly infringe upon the sovereign rights of neighboring Indian nations and
abrogate a state government’s statutory obligation, under IGRA, to negotiate, in good faith, a Class III compact with any resident Indian nation that desires to conduct Class III gaming anywhere within such nation’s borders;

 

Seneca v. USET — Improper Influence Case

The Eleventh Circuit held that Dean Seneca, a former employee of the Office of Tribal Affairs in the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, failed to exhaust his administrative remedies under the FTCA before suing the US and USET. He was reprimanded after allegedly making improper communications with USET over the text of proposed Congressional testimony.

seneca-v-uset-ca11-opinion

seneca-brief

US Brief