Sarah Joseph has posted “Transnational Corporations and Indigenous Rights” on SSRN. The paper was published by BALAYI: Culture, Law, and Colonialism.
From the abstract:
Sarah Joseph has posted “Transnational Corporations and Indigenous Rights” on SSRN. The paper was published by BALAYI: Culture, Law, and Colonialism.
From the abstract:
Kate Fort dug this up — it’s a Michigan Law Review article from then-Professor Scalia on federal sovereign immunity in the context of public lands cases, pre-APA. Most of the cases he discusses involving Indian lands. His aversion to federal common law is apparent at the end of the article.
It looks like I’ll have a short paper in the Federal Lawyer in the March/April 2008 issue they publish in conjunction with the FBA Indian Law Conference. This one is called “The Supreme Court and the Rule of Law: Indian Law Case Studies” and is based in part on my forthcoming Hastings Law Journal article, “The Supreme Court’s Indian Problem” (well, it’s sort of like outtakes from that article).
Here’s the abstract:
William Baude, a clerk for Judge McConnell of the CA10, has just posted “The Judgment Power” on SSRN, forthcoming in the Georgetown Law Journal.
Here’s the abstract:
Mark J. Bennett & Nicole Roughan have posted “Rebus Sic Stantibus and the Treaty of Waitangi” on SSRN. This is a very interesting paper, a response to the argument put forth by renowned legal thinker Jeremy Waldron that the doctrine of rebus sic stantibus could be applied to the Treaty of Waitangi to effectively abrogate it. In short, this argument goes, the passage of time and radically changed political realities could serve to render the Treaty unenforceable.
This, I think, is a similar argument to what the Vermont Supreme Court made in State v. Elliott and what the U.S. Supreme Court did in Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation — where the passage of time and changed political circumstances appear to render Indian treaty rights nugatory. In short, it’s troubling.
From the abstract:
Carla Pratt (Penn State) has published “Loving Indian Style: Maintaining Racial Caste and Tribal Sovereignty Through Sexual Assimilation” in the Wisconsin Law Review as part of the Review’s symposium on Loving v. Virginia.
Here’s the intro:
Here’s the newest Indian Law Profs Newsletter from Judy Royster:
The Harvard Environmental Law Review published a case note on the Trail Smelter case, “Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.“ The Supreme Court will decide shortly whether or not the hear the case, though the Solicitor General has argued in favor of a denial of cert. The case involves water pollution of tribal waters at Colville by a Canadian smelter.
Mary Ann King published “Co-Management or Contracting? Agreements Between Native American Tribes and the U.S. National Park Service Pursuant to the 1994 Tribal Self-Governance Act” in the Harvard Environmental Law Review.
From the introduction:
Here, the Citizen Potawatomi Nation paid its chairman using interest from tax-exempt trust funds, expecting the chairman to then be exempt from federal income tax. Not so, according to the IRS — and the Western District of Oklahoma agreed.
Here are the materials:
You must be logged in to post a comment.