Final Rule on Tribal Veteran Service Officers

Here. With apologies for the lateness of this post, this rule was promulgated at the end of the Obama Administration:

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its regulations concerning recognition of certain national, State, and regional or local organizations for purposes of VA claims representation. Specifically, this rulemaking allows the Secretary to recognize tribal organizations in a similar manner as the Secretary recognizes State organizations. The final rule allows a tribal organization that is established and funded by one or more tribal governments to be recognized for the purpose of providing assistance on VA benefit claims. In addition, the final rule allows an employee of a tribal government to become accredited through a recognized State organization in a similar manner as a County Veterans’ Service Officer (CVSO) may become accredited through a recognized State organization. The effect of this action is to address the needs of Native American populations who are geographically isolated from existing recognized Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs) or who may not be utilizing other recognized VSOs due to cultural barriers or lack of familiarity with those organizations.

Effective Date: This rule is effective February 21, 2017.

The Judges’ Page Devotes Issue to the Topic of Tribal Issues in Dependency Court

The Judges’ Page, a newsletter published by the National CASA Association and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, has just released the summer 2015 issue.  The entire issue is devoted to the theme Tribal Issues in Dependency Court.

The newsletter is available here.

From Judge Dean Lewis (ret):

The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) and the National CASA Association are partners in publishing The Judges’ Page. Both organizations are deeply committed to effective court advocacy for American Indian and Alaska Native children and families involved in dependency court proceedings. This issue of The Judges’ Page addresses the importance of compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) from the legal as well as the cultural perspective. The issue provides effective educational tools for ICWA implementation and offers examples of collaborations between state and tribal courts.

Readers should be aware that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) issued updated Guidelines for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceeding effective February 25, 2015. The updated Guidelines are intended to promote compliance with ICWA’s stated goals and to provide best practices for ICWA compliance by state courts and child welfare agencies. In addition, on March 20, 2015, the Bureau of Indian Affairs proposed Regulations for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings. Recently, Congress passed two bills to help protect Native American Children: The Native American Children’s Safety Act and the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children Act. The Executive branch and the Congress are to be commended for their efforts to clarify the original intent of the ICWA, and to promote the health, safety, and well-being of Native Children.

The NCJFCJ Tribal Caucus identified key topics of concern to be addressed in this issue of The Judges’ Page. Our thanks to Victoria Sweet, Program Attorney at NCJFCJ, for seeking input from the Caucus and securing numerous articles for this issue. Donna Goldsmith was tasked with developing a primer for judges and advocates on key issues for implementation of the ICWA, and we appreciate her undertaking that project. Our thanks also to Judge Len Edwards and Jennifer Walter of the Center for Families, Children & the Courts of the Judicial Council of California for securing and writing articles that exhibit the remarkable best practices instituted throughout that state. And, to all of the authors who volunteered their time to contribute to this issue, thank you.

Articles in This Issue

Judge William A. Thorne, Jr. (ret), describes the background that led to the adoption of the Indian Child Welfare Act and its relevance to treatment of all children impacted by the child welfare process.

Donna Goldsmith, JD, informs readers of the ICWA legal requirements and provides a primer of how to proceed in ICWA cases utilizing the provisions of the BIA updated Guidelines for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody.

Victoria Sweet, JD, gives an overview of the updated BIA Guidelines for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings and proposed Regulations for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings.

Mary Beth Jager, MSW, Rachel Rose Starks, MA, Adrian T. Smith, JD, MSW, and Miriam Jorgensen, PhD, collaborated to share the history of tribal child welfare systems and lawmaking which have been recognized by the ICWA as the governance
mechanism by which a tribe establishes and implements jurisdiction for the wellbeing of Indian children.

Judge Leonard Edwards (ret.) discusses the ICWA active efforts requirement and distinguishes active efforts from reasonable efforts.

Victoria Sweet, JD, describes the commitment of NCJFCJ to implementation of the ICWA. She introduces readers to NCJFCJ publications and includes the recommendation of NCJFCJ that state court judges apply the recently revised Bureau of Indian Affairs ICWA Guidelines.

Paige Beard, Director of Program Development at the National CASA Association, provides background on the National CASA Association’s commitment to training and supporting CASA volunteers who serve Indian
children through Tribal Courts and Dual State Court/Tribal Court Programs.

Judge Korey Wahwassuck reports on how the joint tribal-state jurisdiction in Itasca County, MN, has proven effective in promoting lifetime healing while protecting public safety, and how this model can be used as a tool for reducing the number of children in out-of-home placement, as well as speeding reunification.

The California Judicial Council established a Tribal/State Projects Unit in 2009 as part of the Center for Families, Children & the Courts. This unit staffs the California Tribal Court-State Court Forum (forum), which was formed in 2010. Judges and staff share their perspectives on their collaborative work locally and statewide through the forum.

Judge Leonard Edwards (ret.) discusses the ICWA active efforts requirement and distinguishes active efforts from reasonable efforts.

Justice Jill Elizabeth Tompkins reviews the provisions of the ICWA and the updated Guidelines for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings provisions regarding transfer of an Indian child’s case from a state court to a tribal court from the perspective of the tribal court.

Jack Trope, JD, and Sarah L. Kastelic, PhD, set out the ICWA placement preferences. They explain the limitation on the “good cause” exception as established in the updated Guidelines for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings.

Claire Chiamulera of the ABA Center on Children and the Law shares her recommendations in “Best Practice for Native American and All Families” reprinted from Child Law Practice.

Kathryn E. Fort, JD, offers insight and best practices on ICWA cases involving military families.

Jessica Jorgensen, JD, offers her perspective on the issue of “good cause” to deviate from ICWA placement preferences.
Web Resources is an article that provides readers with the websites of organizations that produce educational materials on the ICWA as well as resources and assistance in implementation of the ICWA.

Federal Initiative to Hire More Native Vets at BIA

Press Release here. Website here.

To achieve the goal of hiring more American Indian and Alaska Native veterans throughout Indian Affairs offices and bureaus, Washburn announced plans to increase the number of Indian veterans hired from the current rate of 9 percent to 12.5 percent.

Article Recognizing the Contribution of Choctaw Code Talkers in WWI

Full Article Here

In the autumn of 1918, US troops were involved in the Meuse-Argonne Offensive on the Western Front. It was one of the largest frontline commitments of American soldiers in WW1, but communications in the field were compromised. The Germans had successfully tapped telephone lines, were deciphering codes and repeatedly capturing runners sent out to deliver messages directly.

“It was a huge problem and they couldn’t figure out a way around it,” says Matt Reed, curator of American Indian Collections at the Oklahoma History Center, the headquarters of the Oklahoma Historical Society.

The solution was stumbled upon by chance, an overheard conversation between two Choctaw soldiers in the 142nd Infantry Regiment. The pair were chatting in camp when a captain walked by and asked what language they were speaking. Realising the potential for communication, he then asked if there were other speakers among the troops. The men knew of Choctaw soldiers at company headquarters. Using a field telephone the captain got the men to deliver a message in their native tongue which their colleagues quickly translated back into English. The Choctaw Telephone Squad was born and so was code talking. . . .

But at the same time,the Choctaw language was under pressure back in the US. It was a time of cultural assimilation. Government attempts to “civilise” American Indians involved putting their children in state-run boarding schools, where they were often severely punished for speaking in their native tongue.

“You had this crazy situation where the Choctaw language was being used as a formidable weapon of war, yet back home children were being beaten at school for using it,” says Judy Allen, senior executive officer of tribal relations with the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. “The two soldiers who were overheard by the officer probably thought they were in trouble rather than about to provide the answer to the army’s communication problems.”