Here is the order.
That’s the fourth (?!?!?!) recent CVSG on an Indian law cert petition.
Materials are here.
As expected, though one never knows with the tribal court jurisdiction cases, the Supreme Court denied cert in API v. Sac and Fox (order list here).
API was a non-Indian-owned business hired by a tribal group (or individual) to enter into a tribal governmental office to retrieve documents and perform other security-related tasks. The tribal court held it had jurisdiction under Montana 2 to adjudicate contract and tort claims relating to that activity. There probably isn’t a better fact pattern for a Montana 2 “political integrity” exception to Montana’s general rule.
Here. Interesting petition, if for no other reason than the respondent supports the petition (!!!).
Title: Miccosukee Tribe v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Co.
Docket: 10-717
Issue(s): Whether an action to obtain recognition of an Indian tribal court judgment presents a federal question under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
ETA-the petition was listed as a petition to watch by SCOTUSblog on 1/20 because it will likely be considered by the Justices at their 1/21 conference.
There are two (actually three) petitions that will be discussed at least indirectly at today’s Conference (SCOTUSblog link here). We will know Monday if any of these petitions are granted, and later in the week if any are denied. In order of our estimates of the chance of a grant, here they are:
Significant likelihood (perhaps over 50 percent), based entirely on the fact that the Court typically grants far more than half of the federal government’s cert petitions:
Title: United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
Docket: 10-382
Issue(s): Whether the attorney-client privilege entitles the United States to withhold from an Indian tribe confidential communications between the government and government attorneys implicating the administration of statutes pertaining to property held in trust for the tribe.
Likely being held for discussion depending on the determination in Jicarilla is the U.S. v. Eastern Shawnee petition (here).
Very surprising! It is exceptionally rare for a private, non-Indian respondent that has won below to file a brief in support of a tribal cert petition.
Here is the brief: Kraus-Anderson Brief in Support of Petition
And the petition, with link to lower court materials.
Here is the petition in Day v. Apoliona: Day Cert Petition
Question presented:
Whether officials of the State of Hawaii may expend funds subject to the trust established by § 5(f) of the Hawaii Admission Act for the betterment of Hawaiians without regard to the blood quantum established by § 201(a)(7) of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920?
Lower court opinion here.
Here: API Reply.
The petition (No. 10-613) is up for discussion in the Conference of Jan. 14, 2011.
Here: Sac and Fox Cert Opp.
You must be logged in to post a comment.