ICRA Habeas Claim against Fort Peck Dismissed on Exhaustion Grounds

Here are the materials in Lambert v. Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes (D. Mont.):

5 Magistrate Report

6 DCT Order

Tort Suit against Rocky Boys’ Business Committee Dismissed

Here are the materials in Eagleman v. Rocky Boys’ Chippewa-Cree Tribal Business Committee (D. Mont.):

16 Motion to Dismiss

16-3 Eagleman Trial Court Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

16-4 Tribal Trial Court Order

16-5 Eagleman Tribal Appellate Brief

16-6 Tribal Appellate Court Opinion

33 Opposition

37 Reply

42 DCT Order

Federal Court Quashes Third Party Subpoena of Fort Belkap Indian Community Officers and Docs

Here are the materials in Matt v. United States (D. Mont.):

26 Motion to Compel

37 Fort Belknap Motion to Quash

40-1 Opposition to Motio to Quash

42 Fort Belknap Reply

45 DCT Order Granting Motion to Quash

The underlying complaint against the US is here:

1 Complaint

News coverage.

ICRA Habeas Dismissed Because Tribal Prisoner Transferred to Federal Jail

Here are the materials in Granbois v. Fort Peck Tribal Jail (D. Mont.):

1 Petition

2 DCT Order

Federal Court Refuses to Reconsider Tribal Court Exhaustion Order

Here are the materials in Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Gervais (D. Mont.):

13 Motion to Amend

14 Response

17 Reply

18 DCT Order

The original order is here.

Federal Court Dismisses Irrigation District’s Challenge to BIA Control of Flathead Irrigation Water

Here are the materials in Flathead Irrigation District v. Jewell (D. Mont.):

56 US Motion to Dismiss

58 Opposition

63 Reply

76 DCT Order

Crow Allottees Challenge to Crow Water Compact Dismissed on Federal Immunity Grounds

Here are the materials in Crow Allottees Association v. Bureau of Indian Affairs (D. Mont.):

35 BIA Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

38 Response

42 BIA Reply

59 DCT Order

Federal Court Dismisses Town of Browning v. Sharp, States Town Has Tribal Court Remedy

Here are the materials in Town of Browning v. Sharp (D. Mont.):

71 Sharp 12b1 Motion to Dismiss

73 Sharp 12b6 Motion to Dismiss

75 Sharp 12b7 Motion to Dismiss

95 Town Response to 71

96 Town Response to 73

97 Town Response to 75

115 Sharp Reply in Support of 75

156 Magistrate Recommendation

162 DCT Order

An excerpt:

No adequate alternative forum exists to address the Town of Browning’s ex Parte Young action. The Blackfeet Tribal Court appears to represent an adequate alternative forum, however, to address the ongoing dispute between the Blackfeet Tribe and the Town of Browning. Indeed, in the Blackfeet Tribal Court, the Town of Browning can litigate against the Blackfeet Tribe directly rather than through an ex Parte Young action. Further, the Town of Browning appears to have moderated its position regarding the relief that it seeks. (Doc. 159). The Town of Browning appears to seek some reasonable compensation from the Blackfeet Tribe for use of the Town of Browning’s water main to deliver water to utility customers. The Town of Browning can seek and obtain this relief as a counterclaim in the breach of contract claim currently pending in the Blackfeet Tribal Court. Although the Town of Browning has challenged the Blackfeet Tribal Court’s jurisdiction over it on the grounds of sovereign immunity, the existence of a contract between the parties appears to confer jurisdiction on the Blackfeet Tribal Court. Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544, 565 (1981). An alternative forum exists for the Town of Browning to obtain the relief it seeks.

After weighing the factors listed in Rule 19(b), this Court has determined that this case should not proceed in the absence of the Blackfeet Tribe, a required party. The potential prejudice to the Blackfeet Tribe far outweighs the harm to the Town of Browning. The Blackfeet Tribal Court represents an alternative forum for the Town of Browning to address its underlying dispute with the Blackfeet Tribe.

Materials on the preliminary injunction stage of this litigation are here.

Federal Court Denies Town’s Motion for Injunction against Blackfeet Tribe Officials in Utility Dispute

Here are the materials in Town of Browning v. Sharp (D. Mont.):

127 Motion for PI

129 Response

131 Reply

150 Magistrate Report

153 Objections

155 Reply to Objections

157 DCT Order Denying PI

Prior post here.

Federal Court Orders Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies in Suit Brought against Utility in Blackfeet Tribal Court

Here are the materials in Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Gervais (D. Mont.):

3 Motion to Dismiss

6 Opposition

9 Reply

10 DCT Order

An excerpt:

The Court at this juncture simply must determine whether jurisdiction is “plainly” lacking. The standard set forth in Grand Canyon Skywalk applies to this case irrespective ofthe ambiguous nature of the land ownership. Glacier Electric’s actions, at the minimum, amount to an intrusion on the Blackfeet Tribe’s right to exclude. Glacier Electric’s actions could be subject to the Blackfeet Tribe’s right to regulate and adjudicate non-members based on interference with its right to exclude.