Here are new materials in Fletcher v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

Here is the opinion in Fletcher v. United States. An excerpt:
Plaintiffs William Fletcher, Tara Damron, Richard Longsinger, and Kathryn Redcorn, individual holders of Osage headrights, filed suit against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims (Claims Court) seeking damages resulting from breach of fiduciary duties relating to royalties from the Osage mineral estate. Fletcher v. United States, 151 Fed. Cl. 487 (2020) (Claims Court Decision). Because the Claims Court incorrectly concluded that the plaintiffs had no standing and had failed to identify a source of money-mandating obligation as required under the Tucker Act, we reverse the dismissal of the complaint. We also vacate the Claims Court’s decision on the availability of a damages accounting and the striking of declarations.
Briefs here.

Here are the materials in Fletcher v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
10-7 Wilson Pipestem Declaration
We posted the complaint here.
Here is the opinion in Fletcher v. United States (PDF):
Briefs:
Here are the updated materials in Fletcher v. United States (N.D. Okla.):
1285 US Motion to Alter Judgment
1289 Fletcher Motion to Alter Judgment
Underlying order here.
Here are the materials in Fletcher v. United States (N.D. Okla.):
1262 Fletcher Brief on the Merits
Here are the new materials in Fletcher v. United States (N.D. Okla.):
1196 DCT Order Certifying Class
This case is on remand from the Tenth Circuit; post here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.