Here is the opinion in Jarvis v. United States.

Here is the opinion in Jarvis v. United States.
Here is the opinion in Fletcher v. United States. An excerpt:
Plaintiffs William Fletcher, Tara Damron, Richard Longsinger, and Kathryn Redcorn, individual holders of Osage headrights, filed suit against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims (Claims Court) seeking damages resulting from breach of fiduciary duties relating to royalties from the Osage mineral estate. Fletcher v. United States, 151 Fed. Cl. 487 (2020) (Claims Court Decision). Because the Claims Court incorrectly concluded that the plaintiffs had no standing and had failed to identify a source of money-mandating obligation as required under the Tucker Act, we reverse the dismissal of the complaint. We also vacate the Claims Court’s decision on the availability of a damages accounting and the striking of declarations.
Briefs here.
Here are the materials in Jones v. United States (Fed. Cir.):
Prior post here.
Here is the opinion in Asset Protection & Security v. United States:
Here are the materials in Jones v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
150-1 US Motion for Summary Judgment
Prior post here.
Briefs and lower court materials here.
Here is the petition in Bales v. United States:
Question presented:
Whether, against the legal backdrop of Congress’s and this Court’s recognition of the primacy of state law to determine, quantify, and administer water rights, a federal court may deem federal agency regulatory action under the Endangered Species Act to constitute the adjudication and administration of water rights for tribal purposes.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Here are the materials in Landreth v. United States:
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Jones v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Prior posts here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.