Here are the materials in Hall v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich.):
13 Sault Tribe Motion to Dismiss
Here are the materials in Hall v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich.):
13 Sault Tribe Motion to Dismiss
Here is the complaint in Cavazos v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
An earlier suit was dismissed for failure to exhaust.
Here:
Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Motion to Take Judicial Notice
Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Graham v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Citizenship Committee (also here):
Doc.-4-Appellants-Brief-02242020
Doc.-14-Appellees-Response-Brief-06122020
Here are the new materials in Alegre v. United States (S.D. Cal.):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Reyes v. Dept. of the Interior (S.D. Cal.):
Yesterday, we covered tribal constitutions. Today, the political and bureaucratic complexity of enrollment decisions in cartoon form (we will conclude tomorrow):
Apparently, in 1977 or so, the Phoenix Area Office decided to write a lengthy manual for tribal governments, instructing them on how to make enrollment decisions that met tribal constitutional muster. Suffice it to say the text is TL:DR, but the illustrations are awesome — and by awesome, I mean crazy — and by crazy, I mean Indian country crazy.
Tomorrow, how tribal governments make membership decisions….
Here are the papers in State v. Rabang (Whatcom Sup. Ct.), where, in companion cases, four Nooksack 306 disenrollees successfully asserted Treaty fishing rights under U.S. v. Washington:
Here are the latest papers in Doucette v. Bernhardt (W.D. Wash.), where the federal court denied Plaintiffs’ Rule 62.1 post-judgment motion; Plaintiffs have appealed to the Ninth Circuit:
Here are the latest papers in Adams v. Dodge (W.D. Wash.), where a Lummi citizen who relinquished her Nooksack membership is seeking a federal writ of habeas corpus in challenge to her detention by the Nooksack Tribal Court: