Here are the materials in (Fed. Cl.):
Related suit here.
Here are the materials in (Fed. Cl.):
Related suit here.
Here is the unpublished opinion in Cloud v. United States.
Briefs:
Here is the opinion in LaBatte v . United States.
Briefs:
Here are the materials in Labatte v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Here are the materials in Quapaw Tribe v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Here is today’s order list. From the order:
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment with respect to all matters relating to respondent’s Revenue Sharing Act claim is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with instructions to dismiss that claim as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950).
Lower court materials here.
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. 1491(a)(1), or Indian Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. 1505, grants the Court of Federal Claims subject-matter jurisdiction over an Indian Tribe’s claim for money damages against the United States, based on the United States’ purported violation of sources of law that do not themselves mandate a damages remedy for their violation.
2. Whether the United States may be required to pay damages for failing to provide an Indian Tribe with a statutorily defined portion of a statutory fund, where Congress enacted limited appropriations for that fund and those appropriations were exhausted over a decade before the tribe filed its action for money damages.
Lower court materials are here.
Here are those materials in Round Valley Indian Tribe v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
DCT Order Denying Lohman Intervention Motion
The underlying judgment favoring the tribe is here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.